The effect of contest participation and contest outcome on subsequent prosocial behavior
- PMID: 33141829
- PMCID: PMC7608921
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240712
The effect of contest participation and contest outcome on subsequent prosocial behavior
Abstract
Following previous research on various aspects of contests, we aim to explore how taking part in a contest affects subsequent behavior. We focus on whether the experience of having just competed in a contest, beyond its outcome, would have an impact on other-regarding decisions towards an individual who was not part of the preliminary contest. In addition, in light of inconclusive results in the existing literature regarding the effect of contest outcome on subsequent prosociality, we reexamine this effect. In line with our hypothesis, participation in a contest was found to reduce prosociality. Additionally, we found that winning a contest reduced prosociality only when decisions were framed as "giving" decisions and not as "dividing" decisions. This finding suggests that the effect of contest outcome may depend on specific elements of the presented situations.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 Feb;81(1):33-74. doi: 10.1017/S146479310500686X. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006. PMID: 16460581 Review.
-
Effects of Prior Contest Experience and Contest Outcome on Female Reproductive Decisions and Offspring Fitness.Am Nat. 2016 Sep;188(3):319-28. doi: 10.1086/687392. Epub 2016 Jun 21. Am Nat. 2016. PMID: 27501089
-
Decoding the Charitable Brain: Empathy, Perspective Taking, and Attention Shifts Differentially Predict Altruistic Giving.J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 27;36(17):4719-32. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3392-15.2016. J Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27122031 Free PMC article.
-
The sociocultural appraisals, values, and emotions (SAVE) framework of prosociality: core processes from gene to meme.Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:425-60. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115054. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014. PMID: 24405363 Review.
-
When is giving an impulse? An ERP investigation of intuitive prosocial behavior.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Jul;11(7):1121-9. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv077. Epub 2015 Jun 17. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 26084530 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Spillover effects of competition outcome on future risky cooperation.Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 4;13(1):5535. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32523-6. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37015992 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Fülöp M. Happy and unhappy competitors: what makes the difference? 2009. December 20;345–367.
-
- Standage M, Duda JL, Pensgaard AM. The Effect of competitive outcome and task-involving, ego-involving, and cooperative structures on the psychological well-being of individuals engaged in a co-ordination task: a self-determination approach. Motivation and Emotion. 2005. March;29(1):41–68. 10.1007/s11031-005-4415-z - DOI
-
- Martens R. Competition: In need of a theory. In: Social problems in athletics Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1976. p. 9–17.
-
- Hegarty WH, Sims HP. Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: an experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1978;63(4):451–7. 10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.451 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources