Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Feb:68:110114.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110114. Epub 2020 Nov 1.

Visualization of aggregate perioperative data improves anesthesia case planning: A randomized, cross-over trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Visualization of aggregate perioperative data improves anesthesia case planning: A randomized, cross-over trial

Jonathan P Wanderer et al. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Study objective: A challenge in reducing unwanted care variation is effectively managing the wide variety of performed surgical procedures. While an organization may perform thousands of types of cases, privacy and logistical constraints prevent review of previous cases to learn about prior practices. To bridge this gap, we developed a system for extracting key data from anesthesia records. Our objective was to determine whether usage of the system would improve case planning performance for anesthesia residents.

Design: Randomized, cross-over trial.

Setting: Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

Measurements: We developed a web-based, data visualization tool for reviewing de-identified anesthesia records. First year anesthesia residents were recruited and performed simulated case planning tasks (e.g., selecting an anesthetic type) across six case scenarios using a randomized, cross-over design after a baseline assessment. An algorithm scored case planning performance based on care components selected by residents occurring frequently among prior anesthetics, which was scored on a 0-4 point scale. Linear mixed effects regression quantified the tool effect on the average performance score, adjusting for potential confounders.

Main results: We analyzed 516 survey questionnaires from 19 residents. The mean performance score was 2.55 ± SD 0.32. Utilization of the tool was associated with an average score improvement of 0.120 points (95% CI 0.060 to 0.179; p < 0.001). Additionally, a 0.055 point improvement due to the "learning effect" was observed from each assessment to the next (95% CI 0.034 to 0.077; p < 0.001). Assessment score was also significantly associated with specific case scenarios (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility of developing of a clinical data visualization system that aggregated key anesthetic information and found that the usage of tools modestly improved residents' performance in simulated case planning.

Keywords: Anesthetic planning; Anesthetic training; Data visualization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Example of the anesthesia case planning tool used to identify practice patterns for laparoscopic appendectomy. The summary page shows the number of anesthetic records included in the aggregated view, the distribution of the primary anesthesia types, surgical positions, airways utilized, surgical time and estimated blood loss. Additionally, the vascular access and patient monitoring approach is displayed. The frequency threshold is used to suppress low frequency occurrences in surgical positions, which is helpful in reducing noise from erroneous documentation.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
This tab demonstrates drug administration by phase of anesthesia care, including the percentage of anesthetics that included each drug and the phase of care that is administered in.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
This view shows drug administration by relative time points, with the zero time point marking the entry of the patient into the OR room.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Distribution of estimated blood loss for the selected procedure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Medical Innovation in the Changing Healthcare Marketplace: Conference Summary National Research Council (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy; Aspden P, editor. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2002. - PubMed
    1. Urbach DR, Baxter NN. Reducing variation in surgical care. BMJ. 2005; 330:1401. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Cowan JA, Lipsett PA. Complications and costs after high-risk surgery: where should we focus quality improvement initiatives? J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 196:671–8. - PubMed
    1. Ahmed J, Khan S, Lim M, Chandrasekaran TV, MacFie J. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols - compliance and variations in practice during routine colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2012; 14:1045–51. - PubMed
    1. Kheterpal S Random clinical decisions: identifying variation in perioperative care. Anesthesiology. 2012; 116:3–5. - PubMed

Publication types