A needle in the haystack? Assessing the significance of envelope (E) gene-negative, nucleocapsid (N2) gene-positive SARS-CoV-2 detection by the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-COV-2 assay
- PMID: 33142250
- PMCID: PMC7598560
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104683
A needle in the haystack? Assessing the significance of envelope (E) gene-negative, nucleocapsid (N2) gene-positive SARS-CoV-2 detection by the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-COV-2 assay
Abstract
The clinical significance of high crossing threshold (Ct) detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR is inadequately defined. In the course of universal admission screening with the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay at our institution, we observed that 3.9 % (44/1123) of SARS-CoV-2 positive results were negative for the envelope (E) gene target but positive for the nucleocapsid (N2) target. The overall SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate during the three-month study period was 15.4 % (1123/7285), spanning April-June 2020. The majority of patients with E-negative, N2-positive results were asymptomatic, with 29.5 % of patients symptomatic for COVID-19 at the time of presentation. Asymptomatic patients with E-negative, N2-positive results were significantly younger than symptomatic patients with the same results (average 37.6 vs. 58.4, p = 0.003). Similar proportions of prior SARS-CoV-2 positivity were noted among symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals (38.5 % vs. 33.3 %, p = 0.82). Among the 16 asymptomatic patients with radiographic imaging performed, four (25 %) had chest radiographic findings concerning for viral pneumonia. Interestingly, we observed an E-negative, N2-positive result in one patient with a previous SARS-CoV-2 by the Xpert Xpress that occurred 71 days prior. Critically, E-negative, N2-positive results were observed in 8 symptomatic patients with a new diagnosis of COVID-19. Thus, though concerns remain about extended SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positivity in some patients, the ability of clinical laboratories to detect patients with high Ct values (including E-negative, N2-positive results) is vital for retaining maximal sensitivity for diagnostic purposes. Our data show that a finding of E-positive, N2-negative SARS-CoV-2 should not be used to rule out the presence of subclinical infection.
Keywords: COVID-19; Ct value; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
SBW has received consulting honoraria from Cepheid. All other authors have no relevant disclosures.
References
-
- Loeffelholz M.J., Alland D., Butler-Wu S.M., Pandey U., Perno C.F., Nava A., Carroll K.C., Mostafa H., Davies E., McEwan A., Rakeman J.L., Fowler R.C., Pawlotsky J.M., Fourati S., Banik S., Banada P.P., Swaminathan S., Chakravorty S., Kwiatkowski R.W., Chu V.C., Kop J., Gaur R., Sin M.L.Y., Nguyen D., Singh S., Zhang N., Persing D.H. Multicenter Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020:58. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mandavilli A. 2020. Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be., P in the New York Times.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
-
- Magleby R., Westblade L.F., Trzebucki A., Simon M.S., Rajan M., Park J., Goyal P., Safford M.M., Satlin M.J. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 viral load on risk of intubation and mortality among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa851. Jun 30;ciaa851. Online ahead of print. PMID: 32603425. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
