Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 30;8(11):461.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8110461.

Radioprotection and Radiomitigation: From the Bench to Clinical Practice

Affiliations
Review

Radioprotection and Radiomitigation: From the Bench to Clinical Practice

Elena Obrador et al. Biomedicines. .

Abstract

The development of protective agents against harmful radiations has been a subject of investigation for decades. However, effective (ideal) radioprotectors and radiomitigators remain an unsolved problem. Because ionizing radiation-induced cellular damage is primarily attributed to free radicals, radical scavengers are promising as potential radioprotectors. Early development of such agents focused on thiol synthetic compounds, e.g., amifostine (2-(3-aminopropylamino) ethylsulfanylphosphonic acid), approved as a radioprotector by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA, USA) but for limited clinical indications and not for nonclinical uses. To date, no new chemical entity has been approved by the FDA as a radiation countermeasure for acute radiation syndrome (ARS). All FDA-approved radiation countermeasures (filgrastim, a recombinant DNA form of the naturally occurring granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, G-CSF; pegfilgrastim, a PEGylated form of the recombinant human G-CSF; sargramostim, a recombinant granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, GM-CSF) are classified as radiomitigators. No radioprotector that can be administered prior to exposure has been approved for ARS. This differentiates radioprotectors (reduce direct damage caused by radiation) and radiomitigators (minimize toxicity even after radiation has been delivered). Molecules under development with the aim of reaching clinical practice and other nonclinical applications are discussed. Assays to evaluate the biological effects of ionizing radiations are also analyzed.

Keywords: antioxidants; free radicals; ionizing radiations; radiomitigators; radioprotectors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consequences of exposure to ionizing radiation in organs and tissues are time- and dose-dependent. The main radiation-induced biological effects are displayed, while indicating the differences between the threshold doses and those that cause a severe effect. Time abbreviations: h, hours; w, weeks; mo, months; y, years. (S*) indicates a main stochastic effect. Acute radiation syndrome (ARS) may be difficult to differentiate from chronic radiation syndrome (CRS) since the dose threshold for the CRS is approximately 0.7–1 Gy (see the text for more details). (1) Possible death (approximately in 2 mo) due to bone marrow depletion. (2) Destruction of the intestinal lining, intestinal bleeding, possible death (1–2 w). (3) Cognitive impairment, convulsion, possible death (hours).

References

    1. Zakariya N.I., Kahn M.T.E. Benefits and Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Sch. Acad. J. Biosci. SAJB. 2014;2:583–591.
    1. Jeon J. Review of Therapeutic Applications of Radiolabeled Functional Nanomaterials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:2323. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092323. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nagataki S., Takamura N. Radioactive Doses—Predicted and Actual—and Likely Health Effects. Clin. Oncol. R. Coll. Radiol. 2016;28:245–254. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.12.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shahbazi-Gahrouei D., Gholami M., Setayandeh S. A review on natural background radiation. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2013;2:65. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.115821. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martinez Marignac V.L., Mondragon L., Favant J.L. Sources of ionizing radiation (IR) and their biological effects. An interdisciplinary view, from the physics to cell and molecular biology. Clin. Cancer Investig. J. 2019;8:129–138.

LinkOut - more resources