Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 18;142(46):19540-19550.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c07381. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

Dialkyl Ether Formation at High-Valent Nickel

Affiliations

Dialkyl Ether Formation at High-Valent Nickel

Franck Le Vaillant et al. J Am Chem Soc. .

Abstract

In this article, we investigated the I2-promoted cyclic dialkyl ether formation from 6-membered oxanickelacycles originally reported by Hillhouse. A detailed mechanistic investigation based on spectroscopic and crystallographic analysis revealed that a putative reductive elimination to forge C(sp3)-OC(sp3) using I2 might not be operative. We isolated a paramagnetic bimetallic NiIII intermediate featuring a unique Ni2(OR)2 (OR = alkoxide) diamond-like core complemented by a μ-iodo bridge between the two Ni centers, which remains stable at low temperatures, thus permitting its characterization by NMR, EPR, X-ray, and HRMS. At higher temperatures (>-10 °C), such bimetallic intermediate thermally decomposes to afford large amounts of elimination products together with iodoalkanols. Observation of the latter suggests that a C(sp3)-I bond reductive elimination occurs preferentially to any other challenging C-O bond reductive elimination. Formation of cyclized THF rings is then believed to occur through cyclization of an alcohol/alkoxide to the recently forged C(sp3)-I bond. The results of this article indicate that the use of F+ oxidants permits the challenging C(sp3)-OC(sp3) bond formation at a high-valent nickel center to proceed in good yields while minimizing deleterious elimination reactions. Preliminary investigations suggest the involvement of a high-valent bimetallic NiIII intermediate which rapidly extrudes the C-O bond product at remarkably low temperatures. The new set of conditions permitted the elusive synthesis of diethyl ether through reductive elimination, a remarkable feature currently beyond the scope of Ni.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1. (A) Williamson Ether Synthesis (Advantages and Pitfalls); (B) Existing Methods for C(sp2)–O Bond Formation Using Ni Catalysts; (C) C(sp3)–O–C(sp3) Bond Formation from High-Valent Ni
Scheme 2
Scheme 2. I2-Promoted C(sp3)–O–C(sp3) Bond Formation: (A) Hillhouse’s Seminal Work with Bipyridine Oxanickelacycles; (B) Love’s Example Using Strained Oxanickelacycle with Bidentate Phosphine
Scheme 3
Scheme 3. Synthetic Route to Oxanickelacyclohexanes
This yield comprises a mixture of 85:15 of 1b and 1b-isomer.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Cyclic voltammogram of 1b (1.0 mM) in CD3CN, recorded versus Ag/AgNO3 electrode, using n-Bu4NPF6 (0.2 M) as electrolyte, under argon, with a scan rate of 100 mV·s–1. Potentials are then converted to the Fc/Fc+ couple.
Scheme 4
Scheme 4. Attempts to C–O Bond Formation after One-Electron Oxidation of 1b To Access High-Valent NiIII
Scheme 5
Scheme 5. (A) Hillhouse I2-Promoted C(sp3)–O–C(sp3) Bond Formation Reaction (Analysis of the Fate of the Organic and Inorganic Compounds); (B) X-ray Structure of Complex 8; (C) NiIII Bimetallic Intermediate 9ab; (D) 1H NMR of Paramagnetic Complex 9a(31)
Disordered iodine atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected distances (Angstroms): Ni1–I1 = N2–I2 = 2.78; Ni1–I2 = Ni2–I1 = 2.83; Ni1–N1 = Ni1–N2 = 2.07. Selected angles (degrees): I1–Ni–I2 = 89.2; Ni1–I1–Ni2 = 94.2. Insets correspond to peaks at 237, −98, and −930 ppm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
X-ray structure of compound 9a. Hydrogen atoms and disordered iodide atoms in I3 counterion are omitted for clarity. Selected distances (Angstroms): Ni1–Ni2 = 2.84; Ni1–I1 = Ni2–I1 = 2.92; Ni1–O1 = Ni1–O2 = Ni2–O1 = Ni2–O2 = 2.00; Ni1–N1 = 1.99; Ni1–N2 = 2.05; Ni1–C1 = 2.013. Selected angles (degrees): Ni1–I1–Ni2 = 58.07; Ni1–O1–Ni2 = 92.72; O1–Ni1–O2 = 79.57.
Figure 3
Figure 3
X-band EPR (9.623 GHz) of complexes 9a and 9b recorded at 30 K (blue traces). Experimental parameters: 1 mW, 100 kHz, 7.5 G field modulation. Red traces represent the Easyspin (esfit) simulation with the following parameters: g(9a) = (2.081, 2.155, 2.279); g(9b) = (2.084, 2.144, 2.287). Dipolar interaction D(9b) = 517 MHz; D(9a) = 550 MHz. J coupling < 50 MHz.
Scheme 6
Scheme 6. Thermal Decomposition of Complex 9b and Hypothetical SN2 Reaction from 7b
Scheme 7
Scheme 7. (A) Screening of Oxidants for the Oxidatively Induced C(sp3)–OC(sp3) Bond Formation; (B) Application to the Synthesis of THF
Reaction conditions: oxanickelacycle 1b (1 equiv), oxidant 10 (1.05 equiv) in CD3CN or CD2Cl2 at 25 °C.
Scheme 8
Scheme 8. (A) Synthesis of (bipy)NiEt211 and (bipy)Ni(Et)(OEt) 1f; (B) Oxidatively Induced Synthesis of Diethyl Ether from Nickel Complex 1f
Reaction conditions: (step 1) Ni(acac)2 (1 equiv), bipy (1 equiv) Et2AlOEt (3 equiv) in Et2O, from −50 to 25 °C, 50 h, 11 87% isolated yield; (step 2) 11 (1 equiv), N2O (1 atm) in THF at 25 °C, 1f 63% isolated yield. Reaction conditions: oxanickelacycle 1f (1 equiv), 10e and 10f (1.05 equiv) in CD3CN at 25 °C, 1 min. Yields determined by 1H NMR using mesitylene as internal standard.
Scheme 9
Scheme 9. (A) EPR of int-I at 20 K; (B) Mass Spectrometry Results and Postulated Mechanistic Pathways
Experimental conditions: Power = 2.0 mW, modulation (100 kHz) amplitude 7.5 G. Dotted red trace represents the Easyspin (esfit) simulation with parameters g = (2.103, 2.200, 2.227). Dipolar interaction D(int-I) = 299 MHz. J coupling = 100 MHz.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roughley S. D.; Jordan A. M. The medicinal chemist’s toolbox: an analysis of reactions used in the pursuit of drug candidates. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 3451.10.1021/jm200187y. - DOI - PubMed
    2. Brown A.; Brown L.; Brown T. B.; Calabrese A.; Ellis D.; Puhalo N.; Smith C. R.; Wallace O.; Watson L. Triazole oxytocin antagonists: identification of aryl ether replacements for a biaryl substituent. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 5242.10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.08.066. - DOI - PubMed
    3. Backes B. J.; Ellman J. A. Solid support linker strategies. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1, 86.10.1016/S1367-5931(97)80113-5. - DOI - PubMed
    4. Ganesan A.Wang resin. Encyclopedia of reagents for organic synthesis; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2003.
    5. Harris J. M.Poly(ethylene glycol) Chemistry: Biotechnical and Biomedical Applications; Plenum Press: New York, 1992.
    1. Williamson A. W. J. Chem. Soc. 1852, 4, 229.10.1039/QJ8520400229. - DOI
    2. Alexander William Williamson (1824–1904) discovered this reaction in 1850 at University College, London

    1. For selected reviews on Williamson ether synthesis, see:

    2. Li J. J.Williamson ether synthesis. Name Reactions; Springer:Cham, 2014.
    3. Wang Z.Williamson Ether Synthesis. Comprehensive Organic Name Reactions and Reagents; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2010; pp 3026–3030.
    1. Xiang J.; Shang M.; Kawamata Y.; Lundberg H.; Reisberg S.; Chen M.; Mykhailiuk P.; Beutner G.; Collins M.; Davies A.; Del Bel M.; Gallego G.; Spangler J.; Starr J. T.; Yang S.; Blackmond D.; Baran P. S. Hindered Dialkyl Ether Synthesis via Electrogenerated Carbocations. Nature 2019, 573, 398.10.1038/s41586-019-1539-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shibutani S.; Kodo T.; Takeda M.; Nagao K.; Tokunaga N.; Sasaki Y.; Ohmiya H. Organophotoredox-Catalyzed Decarboxylative C(sp3)–O Bond Formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1211.10.1021/jacs.9b12335. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types