Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 3;20(1):1641.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09758-3.

Access to care for childhood cancers in India: perspectives of health care providers and the implications for universal health coverage

Affiliations

Access to care for childhood cancers in India: perspectives of health care providers and the implications for universal health coverage

Neha Faruqui et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: There are multiple barriers impeding access to childhood cancer care in the Indian health system. Understanding what the barriers are, how various stakeholders perceive these barriers and what influences their perceptions are essential in improving access to care, thereby contributing towards achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC). This study aims to explore the challenges for accessing childhood cancer care through health care provider perspectives in India.

Methods: This study was conducted in 7 tertiary cancer hospitals (3 public, 3 private and 1 charitable trust hospital) across Delhi and Hyderabad. We recruited 27 healthcare providers involved in childhood cancer care. Semi-structured interviews were audio recorded after obtaining informed consent. A thematic and inductive approach to content analysis was conducted and organised using NVivo 11 software.

Results: Participants described a constellation of interconnected barriers to accessing care such as insufficient infrastructure and supportive care, patient knowledge and awareness, sociocultural beliefs, and weak referral pathways. However, these barriers were reflected upon differently based on participant perception through three key influences: 1) the type of hospital setting: public hospitals constituted more barriers such as patient navigation issues and inadequate health workforce, whereas charitable trust and private hospitals were better equipped to provide services. 2) the participant's cadre: the nature of the participant's role meant a different degree of exposure to the challenges families faced, where for example, social workers provided more in-depth accounts of barriers from their day-to-day interactions with families, compared to oncologists. 3) individual perceptions within cadres: regardless of the hospital setting or cadre, participants expressed individual varied opinions of barriers such as acceptance of delay and recognition of stakeholder accountabilities, where governance was a major issue. These influences alluded to not only tangible and structural barriers but also intangible barriers which are part of service provision and stakeholder relationships.

Conclusion: Although participants acknowledged that accessing childhood cancer care in India is limited by several barriers, perceptions of these barriers varied. Our findings illustrate that health care provider perceptions are shaped by their experiences, interests and standpoints, which are useful towards informing policy for childhood cancers within UHC.

Keywords: Accessing care; Barriers; Childhood cancer; Health care provider; India; Qualitative study; Universal health coverage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have any competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual illustration of influences of perceptions and examples of barriers identified which lead to poor access to health care

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bhakta N, Force LM, Allemani C, Atun R, Bray F, Coleman MP, et al. Childhood cancer burden: a review of global estimates. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(1):e42–e53. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30761-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) GBD Compare. Seattle: University of Washington, IHME; 2017.
    1. Rudrappa S, Agarkhed DV, Vaidya SS. Healthcare systems: India. In: Ratliff J, Albert TJ, Cheng J, Knightly J, editors. Quality spine care: healthcare systems, quality reporting, and risk adjustment. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 211–224.
    1. Mallath MK, Taylor DG, Badwe RA, Rath GK, Shanta V, Pramesh CS, et al. The growing burden of cancer in India: epidemiology and social context. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(6):e205–ee12. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70115-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agarwala S, Mandelia A, Bakhshi S, Srinivas M, Bajpai M, Gupta AK, et al. Neuroblastoma: outcome over a 14 year period from a tertiary care referral Centre in India. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(8):1280–1285. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.03.017. - DOI - PubMed