An implementation science approach for developing and implementing a dietitian-led model of care for gestational diabetes: a pre-post study
- PMID: 33143693
- PMCID: PMC7607700
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03352-6
An implementation science approach for developing and implementing a dietitian-led model of care for gestational diabetes: a pre-post study
Abstract
Background: There is strong evidence that women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) who receive a minimum of three appointments with a dietitian may require medication less often. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a dietitian-led model of care on clinical outcomes and to understand the utility of the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework as a prospective tool for implementation.
Methods: This was a pre-post intervention study measuring outcomes before-and-after changing a gestational diabetes (GDM) model of care and included women with GDM managed at a large, regional hospital in Queensland, Australia. The i-PARIHS framework was used to develop, implement and evaluate a dietitian-led model of care which increased dietetic input for women with GDM to a minimum of one initial education and two review appointments. The outcomes were adherence to the schedule of appointments, clinician perspective of the implementation process, pharmacotherapy use, gestational age at commencement of pharmacotherapy and birth weight. Pre- and post- comparisons of outcomes were made using t-tests and chi-squared tests.
Results: Adherence to the dietetic schedule of appointments was significantly increased from 29 to 82% (p < 0.001) but pharmacotherapy use also increased by 10% (p = 0.10). There were significantly more women in the post-intervention group who were diagnosed with GDM prior to 24 weeks gestation, a strong independent predictor of pharmacotherapy use. Infant birthweight remained unchanged. The i-PARIHS framework was used as a diagnostic tool and checklist in the model of care development phase; a facilitation tool during the implementation phase; and during the evaluation phase was used as a reflection tool to identify how the i-PARIHS constructs and their interactions that may have impacted on clinical outcomes.
Conclusions: The i-PARIHS framework was found to be useful in the development, implementation and evaluation of a dietitian-led model of care which saw almost 90% of women with GDM meet the minimum schedule of dietetic appointments.
Keywords: Dietitian; Gestational diabetes; I-PARIHS; Implementation science framework; Model of care.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
There are not conflicts of interest to report.
Similar articles
-
Detection and initial management of gestational diabetes through primary health care services in Morocco: An effectiveness-implementation trial.PLoS One. 2018 Dec 28;13(12):e0209322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209322. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30592751 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Staff resourcing, guideline implementation and models of care for gestational diabetes mellitus management.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;60(1):115-122. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13032. Epub 2019 Jul 10. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020. PMID: 31292956
-
Associations of dietetic management with maternal and neonatal health outcomes in women diagnosed with gestational diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.J Hum Nutr Diet. 2019 Dec;32(6):728-736. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12682. Epub 2019 Jul 19. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2019. PMID: 31322776
-
Follow-up at 1 year and beyond of women with gestational diabetes treated with insulin and/or oral glucose-lowering agents: a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.Diabetologia. 2019 Nov;62(11):2007-2016. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4935-9. Epub 2019 Jul 4. Diabetologia. 2019. PMID: 31273408 Free PMC article.
-
[Gestational diabetes mellitus].Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016 Apr;128 Suppl 2:S103-12. doi: 10.1007/s00508-015-0941-1. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016. PMID: 27052232 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Medical nutrition therapy for gestational diabetes mellitus in Australia: What has changed in 10 years and how does current practice compare with best practice?J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022 Dec;35(6):1059-1070. doi: 10.1111/jhn.13013. Epub 2022 May 9. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022. PMID: 35384099 Free PMC article.
-
Risk-Prioritised Versus Universal Medical Nutrition Therapy for Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Observational Study.Nutrients. 2025 Jan 15;17(2):294. doi: 10.3390/nu17020294. Nutrients. 2025. PMID: 39861424 Free PMC article.
-
Adherence to Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations in Women with Gestational Diabetes and Associations with Maternal and Infant Health-A Cohort Study.Nutrients. 2022 Mar 17;14(6):1274. doi: 10.3390/nu14061274. Nutrients. 2022. PMID: 35334931 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Readiness for Change: A Baseline Situational Analysis of Breastfeeding Support Within Acute and Community Healthcare Settings in the Republic of Ireland.Matern Child Nutr. 2025 Jul;21(3):e13778. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13778. Epub 2025 Apr 16. Matern Child Nutr. 2025. PMID: 40237361 Free PMC article.
-
Associations of a current Australian model of dietetic care for women diagnosed with gestational diabetes and maternal and neonatal health outcomes.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 8;23(1):971. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09924-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37684621 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Diabetes Service Scheme Gestational Diabetes. https://www.ndss.com.au/gestational-diabetes (accessed June 2019)..
-
- Queensland Government (2016) Perinatal reports and information. https://www.health.qld.gov.au/hsu/peri#annual (accessed December 2019).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources