Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;36(1):1-3.
doi: 10.1017/S1049023X20001405. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

State Preparedness for Crisis Standards of Care in the United States: Implications for Emergency Management

Affiliations

State Preparedness for Crisis Standards of Care in the United States: Implications for Emergency Management

Annie E Ingram et al. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

State governments and hospital facilities are often unprepared to handle a complex medical crisis, despite a moral and ethical obligation to be prepared for disaster. The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has drawn attention to the lack of state guidance on how hospitals should provide care in a crisis. When the resources available are insufficient to treat the current patient load, crisis standards of care (CSC) are implemented to provide care to the population in an ethical manner, while maintaining an ability to handle the surge. This Editorial aims to raise awareness concerning a lack of preparedness that calls for immediate correction at the state and local level.Analysis of state guidelines for implementation of CSC demonstrates a lack of preparedness, as only five states in the US have appropriately completed necessary plans, despite a clear understanding of the danger. States have a legal responsibility to regulate the medical care within their borders. Failure of hospital facilities to properly prepare for disasters is not a new issue; Hurricane Katrina (2005) demonstrated a lack of planning and coordination. Improving disaster health care readiness in the United States requires states to create new policy and legislative directives for the health care facilities within their respective jurisdictions. Hospitals should have clear directives to prepare for disasters as part of a "duty to care" and to ensure that the necessary planning and supplies are available to their employees.

Keywords: crisis standards of care; emergency management; moral distress; pandemic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Committee on Crisis Standards of Care, Board on Health Sciences Policy, & Institute of Medicine. Crisis Standards of Care: A Toolkit for Indicators and Triggers. Washington, DC USA: National Academies Press; 2013. - PubMed
    1. Hertelendy AJ, Ciottone GR, Mitchell CL, Gutberg J, Burkle FM. Crisis standards of care in a pandemic: navigating the ethical, clinical, psychological, and policy-making maelstrom. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Crisis Standards of Care: Ten Years of Successes and Challenges - Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC USA: The National Academies Press; 2020. - PubMed
    1. Romney D, Fox H, Carlson S, Bachmann D, O’Mathuna D, Kman N. Allocation of scarce resources in a pandemic: a systematic review of US state crisis standards of care documents. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020. Epub ahead of print. - PMC - PubMed
    1. White DB, Lo B. A framework for rationing ventilators and critical care beds during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA. 2020;323(18):1773-1774. - PubMed

MeSH terms