Infection, Screening, and Psychological Stress of Health-Care Workers With COVID-19 in a Nonfrontline Clinical Department
- PMID: 33143814
- PMCID: PMC7884665
- DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2020.428
Infection, Screening, and Psychological Stress of Health-Care Workers With COVID-19 in a Nonfrontline Clinical Department
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors and psychological stress of health-care workers (HCWs) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a nonfrontline clinical department.
Methods: Data of 2 source patients and all HCWs with infection risk were obtained in a department in Wuhan from January to February 2020. A questionnaire was designed to evaluate psychological stress of COVID-19 on HCWs.
Results: The overall infection rate was 4.8% in HCWs. Ten of 25 HCWs who contacted with 2 source patients were diagnosed with confirmed COVID-19 (8/10) and suspected COVID-19 (2/10). Other 2 HCWs were transmitted by other patients or colleagues. Close care behaviors included physical examination (6/12), life nursing (4/12), ward rounds (4/12), endoscopic examination (2/12). Contacts fluctuated from 1 to 24 times and each contact was short (8.1 min ± 5.6 min). HCWs wore surgical masks (11/12), gloves (7/12), and isolation clothing (3/12) when providing medical care. Most HCWs experienced a mild course with 2 asymptomatic infections, taking 9.8 d and 20.9 d to obtain viral shedding and clinical cure, respectively. Psychological stress included worry (58.3%), anxiety (83.3%), depression (58.3%), and insomnia (58.3%).
Conclusions: Close contact with COVID-19 patients and insufficient protection were key risk factors. Precaution measures and psychological support on COVID-19 is urgently required for HCWs.
Keywords: COVID-19; health-care worker; nonfrontline; psychological stress; risk factors.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Gender Differences in Psychological and Behavioral Responses of Infected and Uninfected Health-Care Workers During the Early COVID-19 Outbreak.Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 11;9:638975. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.638975. eCollection 2021. Front Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33777887 Free PMC article.
-
Universal COVID-19 screening of 4040 health care workers in a resource-limited setting: an Egyptian pilot model in a university with 12 public hospitals and medical centers.Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Mar 3;50(1):50-61. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa173. Int J Epidemiol. 2021. PMID: 33094320 Free PMC article.
-
The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on health care workers in a MERS-CoV endemic country.J Infect Public Health. 2020 Jun;13(6):877-882. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.05.021. Epub 2020 May 29. J Infect Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32505461 Free PMC article.
-
The need of health policy perspective to protect Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 pandemic. A GRADE rapid review on the N95 respirators effectiveness.PLoS One. 2020 Jun 3;15(6):e0234025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234025. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32492045 Free PMC article.
-
Mental health of Health Care Workers (HCWs): a review of organizational interventions put in place by local institutions to cope with new psychosocial challenges resulting from COVID-19.Psychiatry Res. 2021 May;299:113847. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113847. Epub 2021 Mar 2. Psychiatry Res. 2021. PMID: 33721785 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Risk Perception, Protective Behaviors, and General Anxiety during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic among Affiliated Health Care Professionals in Taiwan: Comparisons with Frontline Health Care Professionals and the General Public.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 13;17(24):9329. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249329. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33322220 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 30;14:17562848211042185. doi: 10.1177/17562848211042185. eCollection 2021. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 34484425 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 24;118(34):e2109229118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2109229118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021. PMID: 34376550 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO. WHO statement on the second meeting of the international health regulations (2005) emergency committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-.... Published 2020. Accessed January 30, 2020.
-
- WHO. Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Situation report 142 (2020). https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/2.... Accessed June 10, 2020.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical