Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 15;4(5):bjgpopen20X101110.
doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101110. Print 2020 Dec.

Parents' expectations and experiences of the 6-week baby check: a qualitative study in primary care

Gill Gilworth  1 , Sarah Milton  2 , Angel Chater  3 , Irwin Nazareth  4 , Andreas Roposch  5 , Judith Green  1
Affiliations

Parents' expectations and experiences of the 6-week baby check: a qualitative study in primary care

Gill Gilworth et al. BJGP Open. .

Abstract

Background: The Newborn and Infant Physical Examination (NIPE) programme requires all babies to have a comprehensive health check at 6-8 weeks of age. These are typically completed by GPs. Although person-centred care has achieved prominence in maternity care policy in recent years, there is limited empirical evidence on what parents and/or carers expect from the check, and how far experiences meet their needs.

Aim: To explore the expectations and experiences of parents attending their GP for a baby check.

Design & setting: A qualitative study was undertaken in primary care in London.

Method: Content analysis was undertaken of transcripts of semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted with a total of 16 participants (14 mothers and two fathers) who had recently attended for a 6-week check for their baby.

Results: Despite the availability of plentiful sources of general advice on infants' health and development, a thorough check by a trusted GP was an important milestone for most parents. They had few specific expectations of the check in terms of what examinations were undertaken, but even experienced parents anticipated reassurance about their baby's normal development. Many also hoped for reassurance about their own parenting. Parents appreciated GPs who explained what they were doing during the examination; space to raise any concerns; and combined mother and baby checks. Referrals to secondary care were generally experienced as reassuring rather than a source of anxiety.

Conclusion: The baby check meets needs beyond those of the NIPE screening programme. Protecting the time for a thorough consultation is important for parents at what can be a vulnerable time.

Keywords: general practice; infant; parents; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Public Health England Newborn and infant physical examination (NIPE) screening programme handbook. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/newborn-and-infant-physical-e.... [21 Jul 2020];2019
    1. Burnett M, Rawlings EL, Reddan T. An audit of referral time frames for ultrasound screening of developmental hip dysplasia in neonates with a normal antenatal clinical examination. Sonography. 2018;5(2):61–66. doi: 10.1002/sono.12147. - DOI
    1. Kapadia J, Babu MRN, Babu RM. Detection of congenital heart disease in mid-Essex. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(577):617–618. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X515179. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Public Health England Newborn and infant physical examination (NIPE) screening: programme overview. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/newborn-and-infant-physical-examination-scre.... [21 Jul 2020];2013
    1. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Postnatal care. Quality standard [QS37] London: NICE; 2015.

LinkOut - more resources