Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):3341-3347.
doi: 10.21873/invivo.12172.

Evaluating the Decision-to-Delivery Interval in Emergency Cesarean Sections and its Impact on Neonatal Outcome

Affiliations

Evaluating the Decision-to-Delivery Interval in Emergency Cesarean Sections and its Impact on Neonatal Outcome

Janna-Alica Brandt et al. In Vivo. 2020 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background/aim: In Germany, performance of an emergency Cesarean section (ECS) is recommended within an interval of ≤20 min from decision to delivery (DDI). The aim of the study was to assess the duration of DDI in ECS as well as its impact on neonatal outcome.

Patients and methods: Data from 437 patients at a single, tertiary care hospital were retrospectively analysed regarding influence on the duration of DDI. Subsequently the impact of DDI on neonatal outcome and incidence of adverse neonatal outcome was analysed.

Results: DDI of ECS performed outside core working hours was significantly prolonged (p<0.001). Shorter DDI showed a statistically worse arterial cord blood pH (p=0.001, r=0.162) and base excess (p=0.05; r=0.094). Duration of DDI had no significant impact on the incidence of adverse neonatal outcome (p=0.123).

Conclusion: Awareness of influence on DDI might contribute to expediting DDI, but duration of DDI showed no impact on the incidence of adverse neonatal outcome. Data were not adequate to suggest a recommendation for DDI time standards.

Keywords: Emergency Cesarean section; decision-to-delivery interval; neonatal outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors have nothing to disclose.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lagrew DC, Bush MC, McKeown AM, Lagrew NG. Emergent (crash) cesarean delivery: indications and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(6):1638–1643. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mohr VD, Bauer J, Döbler K, Eckert O, Fischer B, Woldenga C, Höfele F. Düsseldorf, BQS Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung. 2005. Qualität sichtbar machen: BQS-Qualitätsreport; p. 40.
    1. Caesarean section. London, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists press. 2011. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health Commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; pp. 117–162.
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Committee on Professional Standards: Standards for obstetricgynecologic services. 7th ed. Washington, DC, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 1989:39.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Apgar V, Apgar V, Apgar V. Elk Grove Village, IL , Washington, DC. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2017. American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for perinatal care 8th ed. p. 267.