Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):3551-3557.
doi: 10.21873/invivo.12198.

Impact of Osteopenia on Oncologic Outcomes After Curative Resection for Pancreatic Cancer

Affiliations

Impact of Osteopenia on Oncologic Outcomes After Curative Resection for Pancreatic Cancer

Takashi Motomura et al. In Vivo. 2020 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background/aim: We evaluated the relationship between low bone mineral density (BMD), also called osteopenia, and prognosis in patients who underwent resection for pancreatic cancer (PC).

Patients and methods: We enrolled 91 consecutive patients who underwent curative resections for PC between May 2009 and January 2019. Their BMDs were measured at the Th11 vertebra using computed tomography. Patients were then divided by age-adjusted standard BMD values into the osteopenia group (n=34) and the non-osteopenia group (n=57). Their overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared (log-rank test).

Results: The two groups did not differ in age, BMI, tumor marker, operation time, blood loss, postoperative complications or stage. The osteopenia group had significantly worse 3-year rates for OS (46% vs. 30%, p=0.04) and RFS (41% vs. 26%, p=0.01). In multivariate analysis, osteopenia was an independent prognostic factor for RFS (HR=2.16, p=0.01).

Conclusion: Osteopenia is an adverse prognostic factor for patients with resected PC.

Keywords: Osteopenia; bone marrow density; pancreatic cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors of this manuscript declare that they have no competing interests regarding this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Non-contrast CT image at the level of Th11. A region of interest (ROI) was traced, free-hand, along the vertebra body; the mean value of density was then provided in Hounsfield units (HU).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates between patients with osteopenia and those without osteopenia (age-adjusted). (A) OS was significantly worse in osteopenia group; and (B) age-adjusted osteopenia was a significant risk factor for pancreatic cancer recurrence

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khalili M, Morano WF, Marconcini L, Shaikh MF, Gleeson EM, Styler M, Zebrower M, Bowne WB. Multidisciplinary strategies in bloodless medicine and surgery for patients undergoing pancreatectomy. J Surg Res. 2018;229:208e215. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.04.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsujita E, Ikeda Y, Kinjo N, Yamashita YI, Hisano T, Furukawa M, Taguchi KI, Morita M, Toh Y, Okamura T. Postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of long-term prognosis after pancreatectomy for pancreatic carcinoma: a retrospective analysis. Am Surg. 2017;83(6):610–616. - PubMed
    1. Abe T, Nakata K, Kibe S, Mori Y, Miyasaka Y, Ohuchida K, Ohtsuka T, Oda Y, Nakamura M. Prognostic value of preoperative nutritional and immunological factors in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(13):3996–4003. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6761-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kato Y, Yamada S, Suenaga M, Takami H, Niwa Y, Hayashi M, Iwata N, Kanda M, Tanaka C, Nakayama G, Koike M, Fujiwara M, Kodera Y. Impact of the controlling nutritional status score on the prognosis after curative resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2018;47(7):823–829. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001105. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms