Short-term comparison of preoperative and postoperative pain after indirect decompression surgery and direct decompression surgery in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis
- PMID: 33144633
- PMCID: PMC7642323
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76028-y
Short-term comparison of preoperative and postoperative pain after indirect decompression surgery and direct decompression surgery in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term clinical outcomes between extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS)-transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis. One hundred-six patients were enrolled; 44 were treated with MIS-TLIF (direct decompression group; DP), and 62 were treated with XLIF (indirect decompression group; IDP). Perioperative indexes included operation time and intraoperative bleeding. Perioperative indexes preoperative and postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for low back pain (NRS-BP), leg pain (NRS-LP), and leg numbness (NRS-LN), and the preoperative score on the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ-J) were also assessed. The average follow-up period for the collection of NRS scores was 12.6 months. The operation time was significantly shorter in the IDP than in the DP group (109.9 ± 35.4 vs. 153.3 ± 50.9 min; p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss was also significantly less in the IDP group than in the DP group (85.4 ± 125.4 vs. 258.3 ± 220.4 mL; p < 0.001). The PDQ-J score and preoperative NRS scores (NRS-BP, NRS-LP, and NRS-LN) did not differ significantly between groups. Less improvement in the NRS-BP (ΔNRS-BP) was observed in the DP group than in the IDP group (p < 0.05). Although pain improved after surgery in both groups, IDP surgery was advantageous in minimizing bleeding and preserving posterior support elements such as the facet joints, lamina, and paraspinal muscles. These findings suggest that this may have contributed to the higher rate of improvement in low back pain compared with DP surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17188. Neurosurg Focus. 2017. PMID: 28760035
-
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18722. Neurosurg Focus. 2019. PMID: 31042655
-
Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.Eur Spine J. 2012 Jun;21(6):1171-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2114-x. Epub 2011 Dec 16. Eur Spine J. 2012. PMID: 22173610 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally Invasive Versus Traditional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.202. Epub 2018 Nov 7. World Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 30414524
-
Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine J. 2018 Jun;18(6):1088-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.028. Epub 2018 Feb 13. Spine J. 2018. PMID: 29452283
Cited by
-
Analysis of intervertebral disc CCR6 and IL-6 gene levels with short-term postoperative low back pain after spinal fusion in lumbar degenerative disease.JOR Spine. 2023 Feb 22;6(2):e1252. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1252. eCollection 2023 Jun. JOR Spine. 2023. PMID: 37361330 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of preoperative sagittal spinal imbalance on pain after lateral lumbar interbody fusion.Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 22;12(1):3001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06389-z. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35194048 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between OLIF and MISTLIF in degenerative lumbar stenosis: an age-, sex-, and segment-matched cohort study.Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 14;13(1):13188. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40533-7. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37580586 Free PMC article.
-
Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) compared with unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a 2-year follow-up study.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 24;18(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04111-x. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 37620977 Free PMC article.
-
Early radiological adjacent segment changes following L4/5 fusion: a retrospective comparative study of oblique lateral interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.PeerJ. 2025 Aug 21;13:e19918. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19918. eCollection 2025. PeerJ. 2025. PMID: 40860655 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources