Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 22:2020:8883189.
doi: 10.1155/2020/8883189. eCollection 2020.

Comparison of Survival Rates of Stainless-Steel Crowns Placed with and without Pulpotomy: A Two-Year Retrospective Study

Affiliations

Comparison of Survival Rates of Stainless-Steel Crowns Placed with and without Pulpotomy: A Two-Year Retrospective Study

Fatmah N AlMotawah et al. Int J Dent. .

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to retrospectively compare the survival outcomes over two years between teeth with proximal dental caries that were restored with stainless-steel crowns to those that were pulpotomized and then restored with a stainless-steel crown in patients who were rehabilitated under general anesthesia. Participants and Methods. The records of 131 patients aged between two to six years who had stainless-steel crowns placed under general anesthesia and had two-year follow-up were screened. 340 teeth with moderate proximal caries on the radiograph (D2) were included in the study. Of these, 164 teeth were treated with a pulpotomy and stainless-steel crown, while 176 teeth were crowned without a pulpotomy. The type of each tooth was compared using the Chi-squared test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and curves were plotted based on the two-year outcomes.

Results: Treatment: the sample comprised 59 males (mean age 4.73 years, SD ± 1.4 years) and 72 females (mean age 5.2 years, SD ± 2.0 years). The Kaplan-Meier regression model showed no significant difference in survival outcomes between teeth that had been pulpotomized and those that had not (p = 0.283).

Conclusion: Within the limitations of the current study, we can conclude that performing a pulpotomy does not influence the survival outcome of mild/moderate proximal caries restored with stainless-steel crowns under general anesthesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of the sample.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Types of teeth and their distribution among the groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Types of failure in the two groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier survival plot for stainless-steel crowns with and without pulpotomy.

Similar articles

References

    1. Selwitz R. H., Ismail A. I., Pitts N. B. Dental caries. The Lancet. 2007;369(9555):51–59. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60031-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kidd E., Fejerskov O. Changing concepts in cariology: forty years on. Dental Update. 2013;40(4):277–286. doi: 10.12968/denu.2013.40.4.277. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buldur B. Pathways between parental and individual determinants of dental caries and dental visit behaviours among children: validation of a new conceptual model. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2020;48(4):280–287. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12530. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al Dosari A. M., Wyne A. H., Akpata E. S., Khan N. B. Caries prevalence and its relation to water fluoride levels among schoolchildren in Central Province of Saudi Arabia. International Dental Journal. 2004;54(6):424–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2004.tb00299.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hayes M. J., Cheng B., Musolino R., Rogers A. A. Dietary analysis and nutritional counselling for caries prevention in dental practise: a pilot study. Australian Dental Journal. 2017;62(4):485–492. doi: 10.1111/adj.12524. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources