Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 28;6(10):1813-1818.
doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00736. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

A Photodeactivatable Antagonist for Controlling CREB-Dependent Gene Expression

Affiliations

A Photodeactivatable Antagonist for Controlling CREB-Dependent Gene Expression

Takuma Imoto et al. ACS Cent Sci. .

Abstract

A novel photodeactivation strategy for controlling gene expression has been developed based on light-induced activation of cAMP response element binding protein (CREB). Light-induced cleavage of the photoresponsive protecting group of an antagonist of CREB binding protein (CBP) results in photocleaved products with weak binding affinity for CBP. This photodissociation reaction enables protein-protein interactions between CBP and CREB that trigger the formation of a multiprotein transcription complex to turn gene expression "on". This enables irradiation of antagonist-treated HEK293T cells to be used to trigger temporal recovery of CREB-dependent transcriptional activity and endogenous gene expression under photolytic control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Four photolytic strategies for the optochemical spatiotemporal control of protein activity. (a) Photolytic release of a caged agonist to turn protein activity “on”. (b) Photolytic release of a caged antagonist to turn protein activity “off”. (c) Photolytic cleavage of a photodeactivatable antagonist to turn protein activity “on”. (d) Photolytic cleavage of a photodeactivatable antagonist results in protein–protein interactions affording a complex that turns “on” protein activity and gene expression.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Design of photodeactivatable CBP inhibitors (PCIs). (a) Caged CBP inhibitor strategy for photochemical downregulation of CREB-mediated gene expression. (b) Photocleavage of the o-nitrobenzyl PPG of a PCI affords CI-1 that exhibits weak CBP binding affinity. (c) Photocleavage of a CBP bound antagonist (PCI) results in upregulation of CREB-mediated gene expression. (d) CBP inhibitors, naphthol AS-E and 666-15.,
Figure 3
Figure 3
Photolysis of PCIs. HPLC analyses of the photolytic cleavage products of 50 μM samples of (a) PCI-1 and (b) PCI-2 in 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.4). Time course of the photolysis reactions of (c) PCI-1 and (d) PCI-2 to produce CI-1. Light intensity: 4 mW cm–2, λ = 365 nm ±5 nm. Error bars denote ± SD (N = 3).
Figure 4
Figure 4
CREB inhibitory activities of PCIs before and after photolysis. Inhibition of CREB activity using (a) PCI-1 and (b) PCI-2, with both data sets presented in comparison to CI-1 and PCI photoproducts. Relative luminescence values are reported as a ratio of Firefly:Renilla luciferase luminescent intensities. Photolysis of PCIs (100 μM) carried out using UV illumination (10 mW cm–2, λ = 365 ± 5 nm) for 10 min in Hanks’s buffered saline solution (HBSS). Error bars denote ± SD (N = 3).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Light-mediated recovery of CREB activity in PCI-treated HEK293T cells. CREB-mediated gene expression levels after treatment of cells with 6 μM PCI-1 and PCI-2 before and after illumination (λex = 365 nm, 10 mW cm–2 for 5 min) in HBSS (1% DMSO). Error bars denote ± SD (N = 3). Significance evaluated using the Student t-test.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Results of qRT-PCR experiments used to determine NR4A2 gene expression levels in HEK293T cells. CREB-dependent NR4A2 mRNA expression levels of HEK293T cells treated with 6 μM PCI-1 and PCI-2, before and after illumination (λex = 365 nm, 10 mW cm–2 for 5 min) in DMEM (0.6% DMSO). Error bars denote ± SD (N = 3). Significance evaluated using the Student t-test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yizhar O.; Fenno L. E.; Davidson T. J.; Mogri M.; Deisseroth K. Optogenetics in Neural Systems. Neuron 2011, 71, 9–34. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ellis-Davies G. C. R. Caged Compounds: Photorelease Technology for Control of Cellular Chemistry and Physiology. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 619–628. 10.1038/nmeth1072. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fehrentz T.; Schonberger M.; Trauner D. Optochemical Genetics. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12156–12182. 10.1002/anie.201103236. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klán P.; Šolomek T.; Bochet C. G.; Blanc A.; Givens R.; Rubina M.; Popik V.; Kostikov A.; Wirz J. Photoremovable Protecting Groups in Chemistry and Biology: Reaction Mechanisms and Efficacy. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 119–191. 10.1021/cr300177k. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yip R. W.; Wen Y. X.; Gravel D.; Giasson R.; Sharma D. K Photochemistry of the ortho-Nitrobenzyl System in Solution - Identification of the Biradical Intermediate in the Intramolecular Rearrangement. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 6078–6081. 10.1021/j100169a009. - DOI