SARS-CoV-2 in first trimester pregnancy: a cohort study
- PMID: 33145598
- PMCID: PMC7665455
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa311
SARS-CoV-2 in first trimester pregnancy: a cohort study
Abstract
Study question: Does maternal infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in first trimester pregnancy have an impact on the fetal development as measured by nuchal translucency thickness and pregnancy loss?
Summary answer: Nuchal translucency thickness at the first trimester scan was not significantly different in pregnant women with versus without SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy and there was no significantly increased risk of pregnancy loss in women with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester.
What is known already: Pregnant women are more vulnerable to viral infections. Previous coronavirus epidemics have been associated with increased maternal morbidity, mortality and adverse obstetric outcomes. Currently, no evidence exists regarding possible effects of SARS-CoV-2 in first trimester pregnancies.
Study design, size, duration: Cohort study of 1019 women with a double test taken between 17 February and 23 April 2020, as a part of the combined first trimester risk assessment, and 36 women with a first trimester pregnancy loss between 14 April and 21 May 2020, prior to the double test. The study period was during the first SARS-CoV-2 epidemic wave in Denmark.
Participants/materials, setting, methods: Cohort 1 included pregnant women with a double test taken within the study period. The excess serum from each double test was analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Results were correlated to the nuchal translucency thickness and the number of pregnancy losses before or at the time of the first trimester scan. Cohort 2 included women with a pregnancy loss before the gestational age for double test sample. Serum from a blood test taken the day the pregnancy loss was identified was analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The study was conducted at a public university hospital serving ∼12% of pregnant women and births in Denmark. All participants in the study provided written informed consent.
Main results and the role of chance: Eighteen (1.8%) women had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the serum from the double test suggestive of SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy. There was no significant difference in nuchal translucency thickness for women testing positive for previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 16) versus negative (n = 966) (P = 0.62). There was no significantly increased risk of pregnancy loss for women with antibodies (n = 1) (OR 3.4, 0.08-24.3 95% CI, P = 0.27). None of the women had been hospitalized due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. None of the women with pregnancy loss prior to the double test (Cohort 2) had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.
Limitations, reasons for caution: These results may only apply to similar populations and to patients who do not require hospitalization due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. A limitation of the study is that only 1.8% of the study population had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies suggestive of previous infection.
Wider implication of the findings: Maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection had no effect on the nuchal translucency thickness and there was no significantly increased risk of pregnancy loss for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection in first trimester pregnancy. Evidence concerning COVID-19 in pregnancy is still limited. These data indicate that infection with SARS-CoV-2 in not hospitalized women does not pose a significant threat in first trimester pregnancies. Follow-up studies are needed to establish any risk to a fetus exposed to maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Study funding/competing interest(s): Prof. H.S.N. and colleagues received a grant from the Danish Ministry of Research and Education for research of COVID-19 among pregnant women. The Danish government was not involved in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the report or decision to submit the paper for publication. A.I., J.O.-L., J.B.-R., D.M.S., J.E.-F. and E.R.H. received funding from a Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF) Young Investigator Grant (NNF15OC0016662) and a Danish National Science Foundation Center Grant (6110-00344B). A.I. received a Novo Scholarship. J.O.-L. is funded by an NNF Pregraduate Fellowship (NNF19OC0058982). D.W. is funded by the NNF (NNF18SA0034956, NNF14CC0001, NNF17OC0027594). A.M.K. is funded by a grant from the Rigshospitalet's research fund. H.S.N. has received speaker's fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck Denmark A/S and Ibsa Nordic (outside the submitted work). N.l.C.F. has received a grant from Gedeon Richter (outside the submitted work). A.M.K. has received speaker's fee from Merck (outside the submitted work). The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Trial registration number: N/A.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus; first trimester; maternal infection; nuchal translucency; pregnancy; pregnancy loss.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester and the risk of early miscarriage: a UK population-based prospective cohort study of 3041 pregnancies conceived during the pandemic.Hum Reprod. 2022 May 30;37(6):1126-1133. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac062. Hum Reprod. 2022. PMID: 35389480 Free PMC article.
-
Psychosocial and physical wellbeing in women and male partners undergoing immediate versus postponed modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer after ovarian stimulation and oocyte pick-up: a sub-study of a randomized controlled trial.Hum Reprod. 2025 Jan 1;40(1):96-109. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae260. Hum Reprod. 2025. PMID: 39673443 Clinical Trial.
-
The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study.Hum Reprod. 2019 Jun 4;34(6):1042-1054. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez065. Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 31119299
-
COVID-19 in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk and prevalence of pregnancy loss.Hum Reprod Update. 2024 Mar 1;30(2):133-152. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmad030. Hum Reprod Update. 2024. PMID: 38016805 Free PMC article.
-
The microbiome in reproductive health: protocol for a systems biology approach using a prospective, observational study design.Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Mar 23;2022(2):hoac015. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac015. eCollection 2022. Hum Reprod Open. 2022. PMID: 35441092 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Retrospective Cohort Study on Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19: Does the Gestational Age Affect the Outcome?Cureus. 2023 Feb 19;15(2):e35188. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35188. eCollection 2023 Feb. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 36811131 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 and Variants in Pregnancy.Matern Fetal Med. 2023 Mar 27;5(2):104-114. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000189. eCollection 2023 Apr. Matern Fetal Med. 2023. PMID: 40406388 Free PMC article.
-
SARS-CoV-2 infection is detrimental to pregnancy outcomes after embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI: a prospective cohort study.BMC Med. 2024 Mar 18;22(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03336-9. BMC Med. 2024. PMID: 38500129 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of acute and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07301-z. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 39966754 Free PMC article.
-
Counseling in maternal-fetal medicine: SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;57(5):687-697. doi: 10.1002/uog.23628. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33724545 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous