Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan;28(1):7-15.
doi: 10.1111/iju.14398. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

Lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: Current standards and the latest evidence

Affiliations
Review

Lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: Current standards and the latest evidence

Tohru Nakagawa. Int J Urol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Lymph node dissection is an indispensable component of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Information obtained with lymph node dissection is highly predictive of patient survival, affecting decision-making for adjuvant therapy (diagnostic role). Also, lymph node dissection provides survival benefits in certain patients by removing metastasized nodes (therapeutic role). However, an optimal extent of lymph node dissection has not been established yet. Data from surgical mapping studies showed that approximately 10% of the primary lymphatic landing sites were common iliac nodes, suggesting that lymph node dissection below the common iliac bifurcation is suboptimal. Several retrospective studies have shown a possible survival advantage with more extended lymph node dissection. However, the results of the first prospective randomized controlled trial failed to prove the survival advantage of extended lymph node dissection up to the level of the inferior mesenteric artery, compared with lymph node dissection below the bifurcation of the common iliac artery. Currently, lymph node dissection templates recommended by major guidelines are not consistent with each other. Furthermore, the evidence is limited in the settings of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, robot-assisted surgery and high-risk non-muscle-invasive disease. Physicians need to decide the extent of lymph node dissection for each patient, taking into account the potential survival benefit and possible harms of extended lymph node dissection. Another randomized controlled trial is currently underway and will provide further evidence shortly.

Keywords: bladder cancer; lymph node dissection; randomized controlled trial; survival; urothelial cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Chang SS, Bochner BH, Chou R et al. Treatment of non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO guideline. J. Urol. 2017; 198: 552-9.
    1. European Association of Urology. Oncology guidelines, muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. [Cited 9 May 2020.] Available from URL: https://uroweb.org/guideline/bladder-cancer-muscle-invasive-and-metastatic/
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Bladder cancer. version 4. 2020. [Cited 9 May 2020.] Available from URL: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/bladder.pdf
    1. Gschwend JE, Heck MM, Lehmann J et al. Extended versus limited lymph node dissection in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: survival results from a prospective, randomized trial. Eur. Urol. 2019; 75: 604-11.
    1. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001; 19: 666-75.

LinkOut - more resources