Lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: Current standards and the latest evidence
- PMID: 33145855
- DOI: 10.1111/iju.14398
Lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: Current standards and the latest evidence
Abstract
Lymph node dissection is an indispensable component of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Information obtained with lymph node dissection is highly predictive of patient survival, affecting decision-making for adjuvant therapy (diagnostic role). Also, lymph node dissection provides survival benefits in certain patients by removing metastasized nodes (therapeutic role). However, an optimal extent of lymph node dissection has not been established yet. Data from surgical mapping studies showed that approximately 10% of the primary lymphatic landing sites were common iliac nodes, suggesting that lymph node dissection below the common iliac bifurcation is suboptimal. Several retrospective studies have shown a possible survival advantage with more extended lymph node dissection. However, the results of the first prospective randomized controlled trial failed to prove the survival advantage of extended lymph node dissection up to the level of the inferior mesenteric artery, compared with lymph node dissection below the bifurcation of the common iliac artery. Currently, lymph node dissection templates recommended by major guidelines are not consistent with each other. Furthermore, the evidence is limited in the settings of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, robot-assisted surgery and high-risk non-muscle-invasive disease. Physicians need to decide the extent of lymph node dissection for each patient, taking into account the potential survival benefit and possible harms of extended lymph node dissection. Another randomized controlled trial is currently underway and will provide further evidence shortly.
Keywords: bladder cancer; lymph node dissection; randomized controlled trial; survival; urothelial cancer.
© 2020 The Japanese Urological Association.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment to Lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: Current standards and the latest evidence.Int J Urol. 2021 Jan;28(1):16. doi: 10.1111/iju.14419. Epub 2020 Nov 3. Int J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33145796 No abstract available.
References
-
- Chang SS, Bochner BH, Chou R et al. Treatment of non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO guideline. J. Urol. 2017; 198: 552-9.
-
- European Association of Urology. Oncology guidelines, muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. [Cited 9 May 2020.] Available from URL: https://uroweb.org/guideline/bladder-cancer-muscle-invasive-and-metastatic/
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Bladder cancer. version 4. 2020. [Cited 9 May 2020.] Available from URL: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/bladder.pdf
-
- Gschwend JE, Heck MM, Lehmann J et al. Extended versus limited lymph node dissection in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: survival results from a prospective, randomized trial. Eur. Urol. 2019; 75: 604-11.
-
- Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001; 19: 666-75.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
