Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1977;11(2):143-8.
doi: 10.3109/00365597709179707.

Malignancy grading of epithelial bladder tumours. Reproducibility of grading and comparison between forceps biopsy, aspiration biopsy and exfoliative cytology

Comparative Study

Malignancy grading of epithelial bladder tumours. Reproducibility of grading and comparison between forceps biopsy, aspiration biopsy and exfoliative cytology

C Busch et al. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1977.

Abstract

107 bladder tumours cystoscopically suspected to be malignant were examined morphologically by forceps biopsy, aspiration biopsy and exfoliative cytology. The malignancy was graded from 0 through 4. The reproducibility of each method was established, and was found to be 80%, 65% and 90%, respectively. Exfoliative cytology underestimated the malignancy grade as compared with histopathology (59% of the malignant tumours were not jduged as malignant in the cytological grading), but showed no tendency towards overestimation and gave no falsely postiive diagnoses of malignancy. It is concluded that diagnosis of bladder tumours requires both biopsy and cytological techniques, since they proved complementary in a number of cases. Grading by aspiration biopsy is less reliable but may be of benefit in selected cases where forceps biopsy is less suitable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types