Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 4;15(11):e0241071.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241071. eCollection 2020.

HIV drug resistance profile in South Africa: Findings and implications from the 2017 national HIV household survey

Affiliations

HIV drug resistance profile in South Africa: Findings and implications from the 2017 national HIV household survey

Sizulu Moyo et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) testing was included in the 2017 South African national HIV household survey. We describe the prevalence of HIVDR by drug class, age, sex and antiretroviral drugs (ARV) status.

Methods: Dried blood were spots tested for HIV, with Viral load (VL), exposure to ARVs and HIVDR testing among those HIV positive. HIVDR testing was conducted on samples with VL ≥1000 copies/ml using Next Generation Sequencing. Weighted percentages of HIVDR are reported.

Results: 697/1,105 (63%) of HIV positive samples were sequenced. HIVDR was detected in samples from 200 respondents (27.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 22.8-32.6)). Among these 130 (18.9% (95% CI 14.8-23.8)), had resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) only, 63 (7.8% (95% CI 5.6-10.9)) resistance to NNRTIs and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and 3 (0.5% (95% CI 0.1-2.1)) resistance to protease inhibitors. Sixty-five (55.7% (95% CI 42.6-67.9) of ARV-positive samples had HIVDR compared to 112 (22.8% (95% CI 17.7-28.7)), in ARV-negative samples. HIVDR was found in 75.6% (95% CI 59.2-87.3), n = 27, samples from respondents who reported ARV use but tested ARV-negative, and in 15.3% (95% CI 6.3-32.8), n = 7, respondents who reported no ARV use and tested ARV-negative. There were no significant age and sex differences in HIVDR.

Conclusion: 27% of virally unsuppressed respondents had HIVDR, increasing to 75% among those who had discontinued ARV. Our findings support strengthening first-line ARV regimens by including drugs with a higher resistance barrier and treatment adherence strategies, and close monitoring of HIVDR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Samples tested for HIV drug resistance, South Africa, 2017.
DRT- Drug Resistant Testing; DRMs- Drug Resistant Mutations.
Fig 2
Fig 2. HIV drug resistance among virally unsuppressed survey respondents, South Africa, 2017.
NNRTI- non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NRTI- nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; PI-Protease inhibitors. Bars represent the 95% Confidence interval.

References

    1. UNAIDS, 2019 Global HIV statistics. https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/UNAIDS_FactSheet_...
    1. Simbayi LC, Zuma K, Zungu N, Moyo S, Marinda E, Jooste S, et al. (2018) South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence, Behaviour and Communication Survey, 2017. Cape Town: HSRC Press
    1. SANAC (South African National Aids Council) (2017). Let Our Actions Count. South Africa’s National Plan on HIV, TB & AIDS and STIs 2017–2022 Pretoria: Department of Health. http://sanac.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/NSP_FullDocument_FINAL.pdf
    1. UNAIDS (Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS) (2014a) 90–90–90 An ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS
    1. UNAIDS—Global HIV & AIDS statistics—2018 fact sheet. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances