Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul-Aug;97(4):445-452.
doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

The general movement checklist: A guide to the assessment of general movements during preterm and term age

Affiliations

The general movement checklist: A guide to the assessment of general movements during preterm and term age

Carolina Yuri Panvequio Aizawa et al. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2021 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a checklist describing features of normal and abnormal general movements in order to guide General Movement Assessment novices through the assessment procedure, to provide a quantification of General Movement Assessment; and to demonstrate that normal and abnormal GMs can be distinguished on the basis of a metric checklist score.

Methods: Three examiners used General Movement Assessment and the newly developed GM checklist to assess 20 videos of 16 infants (seven males) recorded at 31-45 weeks postmenstrual age (writhing general movements). Inter- and intra-scorer agreement was determined for General Movement Assessment (nominal data; Kappa values) and the checklist score (metric scale ranging from 0 to 26; Intraclass Correlation values). The scorers' satisfaction with the usefulness of the checklist was assessed by means of a short questionnaire (score 10 for maximum satisfaction).

Results: The scorers' satisfaction ranged from 8.44 to 9.14, which indicates high satisfaction. The median checklist score of the nine videos showing normal general movements was significantly higher than that of the eleven videos showing abnormal general movements (26 vs. 11, p<0.001). The checklist score also differentiated between poor-repertoire (median=13) and cramped-synchronized general movements (median=7; p=0.002). Inter- and intra-scorer agreement on (i) normal vs. abnormal general movements was good to excellent (Kappa=0.68-1.00); (ii) the distinction between the four general movement categories was considerable to excellent (Kappa=0.56-0.93); (iii) the checklist was good to excellent (ICC=0.77-0.96).

Conclusion: The general movement checklist proved an important tool for the evaluation of normal and abnormal general movements; its score may potentially document individual trajectories and the effect of therapeutic intervention.

Keywords: Cerebral palsy; Child development; Early intervention (education); General movements; Neurologic examination; Premature infant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Figure 1
Part 1 of the General Movement Assessment checklist, referring to core data of the infant, and Part 2 (in blue) referring to normal features of preterm GMs.
Fig. 2
Figure 2
Part 3 and Part 5 of the General Movement Assessment checklist, referring to abnormal features of preterm and writhing GMs.
Fig. 3
Figure 3
Part 4 of the General Movement Assessment checklist, referring to normal features of writhing movements.

References

    1. Prechtl H.F., Einspieler C., Cioni G., Bos A.F., Ferrari F., Sontheimer D. An early marker for neurological deficits after perinatal brain lesions. Lancet. 1997;349:1361–1363. - PubMed
    1. Prechtl H.F. General movement assessment as a method of developmental neurology: new paradigms and their consequences. The 1999 Ronnie MacKeith lecture. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43:836–842. - PubMed
    1. Einspieler C., Prechtl H.F. Prechtl’s assessment of general movements: a diagnostic tool for the functional assessment of the young nervous system. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11:61–67. - PubMed
    1. Noble Y., Boyd R. Neonatal assessments for the preterm infant up to 4 months corrected age: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54:129–139. - PubMed
    1. Bosanquet M., Copeland L., Ware R., Boyd R. A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:418–426. - PubMed