Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 4;17(1):148.
doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00779-y.

Systematic review on the application of wearable inertial sensors to quantify everyday life motor activity in people with mobility impairments

Affiliations

Systematic review on the application of wearable inertial sensors to quantify everyday life motor activity in people with mobility impairments

Fabian Marcel Rast et al. J Neuroeng Rehabil. .

Abstract

Background: Recent advances in wearable sensor technologies enable objective and long-term monitoring of motor activities in a patient's habitual environment. People with mobility impairments require appropriate data processing algorithms that deal with their altered movement patterns and determine clinically meaningful outcome measures. Over the years, a large variety of algorithms have been published and this review provides an overview of their outcome measures, the concepts of the algorithms, the type and placement of required sensors as well as the investigated patient populations and measurement properties.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS in October 2019. The search strategy was designed to identify studies that (1) involved people with mobility impairments, (2) used wearable inertial sensors, (3) provided a description of the underlying algorithm, and (4) quantified an aspect of everyday life motor activity. The two review authors independently screened the search hits for eligibility and conducted the data extraction for the narrative review.

Results: Ninety-five studies were included in this review. They covered a large variety of outcome measures and algorithms which can be grouped into four categories: (1) maintaining and changing a body position, (2) walking and moving, (3) moving around using a wheelchair, and (4) activities that involve the upper extremity. The validity or reproducibility of these outcomes measures was investigated in fourteen different patient populations. Most of the studies evaluated the algorithm's accuracy to detect certain activities in unlabeled raw data. The type and placement of required sensor technologies depends on the activity and outcome measure and are thoroughly described in this review. The usability of the applied sensor setups was rarely reported.

Conclusion: This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of applications of wearable inertial sensors to quantify everyday life motor activity in people with mobility impairments. It summarizes the state-of-the-art, it provides quick access to the relevant literature, and it enables the identification of gaps for the evaluation of existing and the development of new algorithms.

Keywords: Accelerometer; Activities of daily living; Algorithms; Disabled persons; Gyroscope; Inertial measurement unit; Machine learning; Patients; Pattern recognition; Rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [120]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Frequency distribution of the used sensor technologies, of the body segments on which sensors were placed, of the study population in which the sensors were applied, and of the used study designs to evaluate the outcome measures

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rast FM, Labruyère R. Protocol of a systematic review on the application of wearable inertial sensors to quantify everyday life motor activity in people with mobility impairments. Syst Rev. 2018;7:174. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0824-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health ICF. 2002. https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/icfbeginnersguide.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2017.
    1. World Health Organization. World report on disability. 2011. https://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/en/. Accessed 5 July 2017.
    1. Del Din S, Hickey A, Woodman S, Hiden H, Morris R, Watson P, et al. Accelerometer-based gait assessment: Pragmatic deployment on an international scale. In: Proc IEEE Stat Signal Process Workshop. 2016; p. 1–5.
    1. Del Din S, Godfrey A, Mazza C, Lord S, Rochester L. Free-living monitoring of Parkinson’s disease: lessons from the field. Mov Disord. 2016;31:1293–1313. doi: 10.1002/mds.26718. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources