Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 4;9(1):257.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01503-6.

Elevating the uses of storytelling approaches within Indigenous health research: a critical and participatory scoping review protocol involving Indigenous people and settlers

Affiliations

Elevating the uses of storytelling approaches within Indigenous health research: a critical and participatory scoping review protocol involving Indigenous people and settlers

Kendra L Rieger et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: There is a complicated and exploitative history of research with Indigenous peoples and accompanying calls to meaningfully and respectfully include Indigenous knowledge in healthcare. Storytelling approaches that privilege Indigenous voices can be a useful tool to break the hold that Western worldviews have within the research. Our collaborative team of Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers, and Indigenous patients, Elders, healthcare providers, and administrators, will conduct a critical participatory, scoping review to identify and examine how storytelling has been used as a method in Indigenous health research.

Methods: Guided by two-eyed seeing, we will use Bassett and McGibbon's adaption of Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology. Relevant articles will be identified through a systematic search of the gray literature, core Indigenous health journals, and online databases including Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AgeLine, Academic Search Complete, Bibliography of Native North Americans, Canadian Reference Centre, and PsycINFO. Qualitative and mixed-methods research articles will be included if the researchers involved Indigenous participants or their healthcare professionals living in Turtle Island (i.e., Canada and the USA), Australia, or Aotearoa (New Zealand); use storytelling as a research method; focus on healthcare phenomena; and are written in English. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full-text articles. We will extract data, identify the array of storytelling approaches, and critically examine how storytelling was valued and used. An intensive collaboration will be woven throughout all review stages as academic researchers co-create this work with Indigenous patients, Elders, healthcare professionals, and administrators. Participatory strategies will include four relational gatherings throughout the project. Based on our findings, we will co-create a framework to guide the respectful use of storytelling as a method in Indigenous health research involving Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples.

Discussion: This work will enable us to elucidate the extent, range, and nature of storytelling within Indigenous health research, to critically reflect on how it has been and could be used, and to develop guidance for the respectful use of this method within research that involves Indigenous peoples and settlers. Our findings will enable the advancement of storytelling methods which meaningfully include Indigenous perspectives, practices, and priorities to benefit the health and wellbeing of Indigenous communities.

Systematic review protocol registration: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/rvf7q ).

Keywords: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples; Aboriginal peoples; Alaska Native peoples; Aotearoa; Australia; Canada; Decolonizing research; First Nations; Health; Indigenous peoples; Inuit; Maori; Metis; Native Americans; New Zealand; Qualitative; Scoping review; Stories; Storytelling; Turtle Island; Two-eyed seeing; USA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Prior D. Decolonising research: a shift toward reconciliation. Nurs Inq. 2007;14(2):162–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2007.00361.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans. In TCPS2 2014. Ottawa: Interagency Secretariat on Research Ethics. 2014. http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/tcps2-eptc2....
    1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. Tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans. In TCPS2 2018. Ottawa: Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research. 2018. http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2018.html.
    1. Archibald J, Lee-Morgan J, De Santolo J. Decolonizing research: Indigenous storywork as methodology. London: Zed Books; 2019.
    1. Fontaine LS, Wood S, Forbes L, Schultz ASH. Listening to First Nations women’ expressions of heart health: mite achimowin digital storytelling study. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2019;78(1):1630233. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2019.1630233. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources