Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Nov;8(2):e001499.
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001499.

RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study

Romain Cohen  1 , Jaafar Bennouna  2 , Aurélia Meurisse  3 , Christophe Tournigand  4 , Christelle De La Fouchardière  5 , David Tougeron  6 , Christophe Borg  7 , Thibault Mazard  8 , Benoist Chibaudel  9 , Marie-Line Garcia-Larnicol  10 , Magali Svrcek  11 , Dewi Vernerey  3 , Yves Menu  12 , Thierry André  13
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study

Romain Cohen et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly effective in patients with microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria may underestimate response to ICIs due to the pseudoprogression phenomenon. The GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study aimed to evaluate the frequency of pseudoprogressions in patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab.

Methods: Patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC previously treated with fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan with/without targeted therapies received nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles then nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until progression or a maximum of 20 cycles. Computed tomography scan tumor assessments were done every 6 weeks for 24 weeks and then every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate at 12 weeks according to RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST by central review.

Results: Of 57 patients included between December 2017 and November 2018, 48.0% received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy, 18.0% had BRAFV600E mutation, and 56.0% had Lynch syndrome-related cancer. Seven patients (12.0%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events; one died due to a treatment-related adverse event. The disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks was 86.0% with RECIST 1.1% and 87.7% with iRECIST. Two pseudoprogressions (3.5%) were observed, at week 6 and at week 36, representing 18% of patients with disease progression per RECIST 1.1 criteria. With a median follow-up of 18.4 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 12-month PFS rate was 72.9% with RECIST 1.1% and 76.5% with iRECIST. The 12-month OS rate was 84%. Overall response rate was 59.7% with both criteria. RAS/BRAF status, sidedness, Lynch syndrome, and other baseline parameters were not associated with PFS.

Conclusion: Pseudoprogression is rare in patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab. This combined ICI therapy confirms impressive DCR and survival outcomes in these patients.

Trial registration number: NCT03350126.

Keywords: CTLA-4 antigen; gastrointestinal neoplasms; immunotherapy; programmed cell death 1 receptor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: TA reports consulting/advisory role and/or received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Clovis, Gritstone Oncology, HalioDx, MSD Oncology, Pierre Fabre, Roche/Ventana, Sanofi, Servier, and Tesaro and has received travel, accommodations, and expenses from Roche/Genentech, MSD Oncology, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. JB reports consulting/advisory role and or received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, Roche, Bayer, Servier, and AstraZeneca and has received travel and accommodations from Roche, MSD Oncology, and AstraZeneca. CB reports consulting/advisory role and/or received honoraria from Bayer, Sanofi, and Roche, and research grant from Roche. RC reports honoraria from Amgen, MSD Oncology, Sanofi, and Servier, and research grant from Servier Institute. TM reports honoraria from Amgen, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Sandoz, travel, accommodations, or expenses by Amgen and research funding from Roche and Amgen. YM received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb. MS reports consulting/advisory role and/or received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astellas, MSD Oncology, and Sanofi and has received travel, accommodations, and expenses from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ventana/Roche. DT reports consulting/advisory role and/or received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, and Merck Serono and has received travel, accommodations, and expenses from MSD Oncology and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Best percentage change in target lesion size from baseline by central review. + sign: BRAF-mutated tumors, yellow triangle: pseudo-progression.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Duration of treatment and response in patients with stable disease or better disease control per RECIST v1.1 criteria. PD, disease progression; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier survival curves of progression-free survival per RECIST v1.1 (A), per iRECIST (B) and overall survival (C) NE, not estimable
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cohen R, Rousseau B, Vidal J, et al. . Immune checkpoint inhibition in colorectal cancer: microsatellite instability and beyond. Target Oncol 2020;15:11–24. 10.1007/s11523-019-00690-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Venderbosch S, Nagtegaal ID, Maughan TS, et al. . Mismatch repair status and BRAF mutation status in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a pooled analysis of the Cairo, CAIRO2, coin, and focus studies. Clin Cancer Res 2014;20:5322–30. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0332 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Llosa NJ, Cruise M, Tam A, et al. . The vigorous immune microenvironment of microsatellite instable colon cancer is balanced by multiple counter-inhibitory checkpoints. Cancer Discov 2015;5:43–51. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0863 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marisa L, Svrcek M, Collura A, et al. . The balance between cytotoxic T-cell lymphocytes and immune checkpoint expression in the prognosis of colon tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018;110:68–77. 10.1093/jnci/djx136 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Le DT, Kim TW, Van Cutsem E, et al. . Phase II open-label study of pembrolizumab in treatment-refractory, microsatellite Instability-High/Mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: KEYNOTE-164. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:11–19. 10.1200/JCO.19.02107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data