Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 3;10(11):e038963.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038963.

Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention

Affiliations

Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention

Tracey Chantler et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the usability and acceptability of an electronic consent pilot intervention for school-based immunisations and assess its impact on consent form returns and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine uptake.

Design: Mixed-methods theory-informed study applying qualitative methods to examine the usability and acceptability of the intervention and quantitative methods to assess its impact.

Setting and participants: The intervention was piloted in 14 secondary schools in seven London boroughs in 2018. Intervention schools were matched with schools using paper consent based on the proportion of students with English as a second language and students receiving free school meals. Participants included nurses, data managers, school-link staff, parents and adolescents.

Interventions: An electronic consent portal where parents could record whether they agreed to or declined vaccination, and nurses could access data to help them manage the immunisation programme.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Comparison of consent form return rates and HPV vaccine uptake between intervention and matched schools.

Results: HPV vaccination uptake did not differ between intervention and matched schools, but timely consent form return was significantly lower in intervention schools (73.3% vs 91.6%, p=0.008). The transition to using electronic consent was not straightforward, while schools and staff understood the potential benefits, they found it difficult to adapt to new ways of working which removed some level of control from schools. Reasons for lower consent form return in e-consent schools included difficulties encountered by some parents in accessing and using the intervention. Adolescents highlighted the potential for electronic consent to by-pass their information needs.

Conclusions: The pilot intervention did not improve consent form return or vaccine uptake due to challenges encountered in transitioning to new working practice. New technologies require embedding before they become incorporated in everyday practice. A re-evaluation once stakeholders are accustomed with electronic consent may be required to understand its impact.

Keywords: information technology; paediatric infectious disease & immunisation; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: TC, SB and SM-J report that they were in receipt of funding from the National Institute of Health Research while conducting this research. ME, RC and EP worked for Public Health England for the duration of this research.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The electronic consent intervention.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Theory of change for the e-consent intervention.HPV, human papilloma virus.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lu B, Kumar A, Castellsagué X, et al. . Efficacy and safety of prophylactic vaccines against cervical HPV infection and diseases among women: a systematic review & meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2011;11:13. 10.1186/1471-2334-11-13 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barr E, Tamms G, Gellin B. Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45:609–17. 10.1086/520654 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paul P, Fabio A. Literature review of HPV vaccine delivery strategies: considerations for school- and non-school based immunization program. Vaccine 2014;32:320–6. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.070 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paterson P, Mounier-Jack S, Saliba V, et al. . Strengthening HPV vaccination delivery: findings from a qualitative service evaluation of the adolescent girls' HPV vaccination programme in England. J Public Health 2019:fdz061. 10.1093/pubmed/fdz061 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bentley C. Tackling gaps and inequalities in girls’ uptake of the current HPV vaccination programme, 2015. Available: http://emhf.org/wp-content/%20uploads/2015/10/EMHF-HPV-Symposium-April-2... [Accessed 29 Jun 2016].

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources