Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention
- PMID: 33148741
- PMCID: PMC7640514
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038963
Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the usability and acceptability of an electronic consent pilot intervention for school-based immunisations and assess its impact on consent form returns and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine uptake.
Design: Mixed-methods theory-informed study applying qualitative methods to examine the usability and acceptability of the intervention and quantitative methods to assess its impact.
Setting and participants: The intervention was piloted in 14 secondary schools in seven London boroughs in 2018. Intervention schools were matched with schools using paper consent based on the proportion of students with English as a second language and students receiving free school meals. Participants included nurses, data managers, school-link staff, parents and adolescents.
Interventions: An electronic consent portal where parents could record whether they agreed to or declined vaccination, and nurses could access data to help them manage the immunisation programme.
Primary and secondary outcome measures: Comparison of consent form return rates and HPV vaccine uptake between intervention and matched schools.
Results: HPV vaccination uptake did not differ between intervention and matched schools, but timely consent form return was significantly lower in intervention schools (73.3% vs 91.6%, p=0.008). The transition to using electronic consent was not straightforward, while schools and staff understood the potential benefits, they found it difficult to adapt to new ways of working which removed some level of control from schools. Reasons for lower consent form return in e-consent schools included difficulties encountered by some parents in accessing and using the intervention. Adolescents highlighted the potential for electronic consent to by-pass their information needs.
Conclusions: The pilot intervention did not improve consent form return or vaccine uptake due to challenges encountered in transitioning to new working practice. New technologies require embedding before they become incorporated in everyday practice. A re-evaluation once stakeholders are accustomed with electronic consent may be required to understand its impact.
Keywords: information technology; paediatric infectious disease & immunisation; public health.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: TC, SB and SM-J report that they were in receipt of funding from the National Institute of Health Research while conducting this research. ME, RC and EP worked for Public Health England for the duration of this research.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Optimising informed consent in school-based adolescent vaccination programmes in England: A multiple methods analysis.Vaccine. 2019 Aug 23;37(36):5218-5224. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.061. Epub 2019 Jul 24. Vaccine. 2019. PMID: 31351797
-
HPV.edu study protocol: a cluster randomised controlled evaluation of education, decisional support and logistical strategies in school-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of adolescents.BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 15;15:896. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2168-5. BMC Public Health. 2015. PMID: 26373926 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake.BMC Public Health. 2018 Mar 20;18(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5278-z. BMC Public Health. 2018. PMID: 29558923 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Views of parents regarding human papillomavirus vaccination: A systematic review and meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative literature.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Apr;15(4):331-337. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 22. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019. PMID: 29804879
-
Approaches to consent in public health research in secondary schools.BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 13;13(6):e070277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070277. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37311635 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Multilevel Targets for Promoting Pediatric HPV Vaccination: A Systematic Review of Parent-Centered, Provider-Centered, and Practice-Centered Interventions in HIC and LMIC Settings.Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Mar 11;13(3):300. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13030300. Vaccines (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40266195 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Electronic informed consent criteria for research ethics review: a scoping review.BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Nov 21;23(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00849-x. BMC Med Ethics. 2022. PMID: 36414962 Free PMC article.
-
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40232221 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a multicomponent intervention to increase parental vaccine confidence and young people's access to the universal HPV vaccination programme in England: protocol for a co-design study.BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 6;12(4):e062050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062050. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35387837 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bentley C. Tackling gaps and inequalities in girls’ uptake of the current HPV vaccination programme, 2015. Available: http://emhf.org/wp-content/%20uploads/2015/10/EMHF-HPV-Symposium-April-2... [Accessed 29 Jun 2016].
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources