Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 3;10(11):e038983.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038983.

Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures of self-management for cancer survivors: a systematic review protocol using COSMIN methodology

Affiliations

Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures of self-management for cancer survivors: a systematic review protocol using COSMIN methodology

Jian Peng et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Self-management is an important strategy for cancer survivors. Evaluating self-management is essential for planning nursing interventions that promote self-management and for measuring the contribution of nursing to health outcomes. Many patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been designed and used to assess self-management in cancer survivors. However, it is unclear which PROM has the best reliability and validity. Therefore, the goal is to systematically review the psychometric properties of existing self-management PROMs and determine which PROM is best for cancer survivors.

Methods and analysis: This systematic review will be conducted according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines for systematic reviews of PROMs. Ten electronic literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE and so on) and two websites for PROMs will be searched from inception to 1 March 2020. Studies testing the psychometric properties of PROMs assessing self-management for cancer survivors, published in either English or Chinese, will be included. Two independent reviewers determined the eligibility of the studies and will independently extract the data. Risk of bias will be assessed using the COSMIN risk-of-bias checklist, and the quality of the results will be assessed using specific COSMIN quality criteria.

Ethics and dissemination: It is not necessary to obtain ethical approval for this systematic review protocol. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference.

Prospero registration number: CRD42020149120.

Keywords: health & safety; oncology; protocols & guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ten steps for conducting systematic review of PROMs (cited from Prinsen et al19). COSMIN, COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; PROMs, patient-reported outcome measures.

Similar articles

References

    1. Denlinger CS, Sanft T, Moslehi JJ, et al. . NCCN guidelines insights: survivorship, version 2.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020;18:1016–23. 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0037 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boland L, Bennett K, Connolly D. Self-Management interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2018;26:1585–95. 10.1007/s00520-017-3999-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cuthbert CA, Farragher JF, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. . Self-Management interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review and evaluation of intervention content and theories. Psychooncology 2019;28:2119–40. 10.1002/pon.5215 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cuthbert CA, Samawi HH, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. . Effectiveness and components of self-management interventions in adult cancer survivors: a protocol for a systematic review and planned meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2018;7:238. 10.1186/s13643-018-0902-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hammer MJ, Ercolano EA, Wright F, et al. . Self-Management for adult patients with cancer: an integrative review. Cancer Nurs 2015;38:E10–26. 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000122 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types