Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures of self-management for cancer survivors: a systematic review protocol using COSMIN methodology
- PMID: 33148743
- PMCID: PMC7640513
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038983
Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures of self-management for cancer survivors: a systematic review protocol using COSMIN methodology
Abstract
Introduction: Self-management is an important strategy for cancer survivors. Evaluating self-management is essential for planning nursing interventions that promote self-management and for measuring the contribution of nursing to health outcomes. Many patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been designed and used to assess self-management in cancer survivors. However, it is unclear which PROM has the best reliability and validity. Therefore, the goal is to systematically review the psychometric properties of existing self-management PROMs and determine which PROM is best for cancer survivors.
Methods and analysis: This systematic review will be conducted according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines for systematic reviews of PROMs. Ten electronic literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE and so on) and two websites for PROMs will be searched from inception to 1 March 2020. Studies testing the psychometric properties of PROMs assessing self-management for cancer survivors, published in either English or Chinese, will be included. Two independent reviewers determined the eligibility of the studies and will independently extract the data. Risk of bias will be assessed using the COSMIN risk-of-bias checklist, and the quality of the results will be assessed using specific COSMIN quality criteria.
Ethics and dissemination: It is not necessary to obtain ethical approval for this systematic review protocol. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference.
Prospero registration number: CRD42020149120.
Keywords: health & safety; oncology; protocols & guidelines.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures of health-related quality of life across the European cancer continuum: a systematic review protocol using COSMIN methodology.BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e088716. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088716. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40157731 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol.BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 10;12(2):e058952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058952. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35144957 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for dysphagia in head and neck cancer: a systematic review protocol using COSMIN methodology.Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 15;11(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01903-w. Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35168687 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8. BJU Int. 2018. PMID: 29726085 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric properties of self-reported financial toxicity measures in cancer survivors: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 24;12(6):e057215. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057215. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35750459 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical