Lower Extremity Kinematic and Kinetic Asymmetries during Running
- PMID: 33148971
- DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002558
Lower Extremity Kinematic and Kinetic Asymmetries during Running
Abstract
Purpose: The primary aims of this investigation were to describe the magnitude of asymmetries of common variables during running among healthy athletes and to determine if sex and speed influence magnitudes of asymmetry.
Methods: This study analyzed routinely collected running gait data on healthy Division I collegiate athletes. All athletes had no history of lower extremity surgery, no lower extremity injuries for 3 months before testing, and running data available at 2.68, 2.95, 3.35, 3.80, and 4.47 m·s-1. Asymmetries were calculated for ground reaction forces, spatiotemporal metrics, joint kinematics, and joint kinetics. Separate linear mixed-effects models assessed the influence of sex, speed, and the interaction on asymmetries of interest. z Scores were calculated for significant effects to further assess the magnitude of differences.
Results: Results from 204 athletes were included. The magnitude of asymmetry varied depending on the variable of interest, with asymmetries ≤3° observed for joint kinematics and greater asymmetries observed among joint work asymmetries ranging from 10% to 40%. No significant interactions between sex and speed were observed. Differences in sex and speed were noted; however, the effect sizes were very small based on z score comparison (-0.17 ≤ z ≤ 0.36) and were unlikely to be meaningful.
Conclusions: The magnitude of asymmetry varies considerably depending on the running gait variable. Interpretation of between-limb asymmetry in running mechanics needs to be specific to the variable of interest, whereas sex or running speed seem to be minor factors.
Copyright © 2020 by the American College of Sports Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Mechanics of walking and running up and downhill: A joint-level perspective to guide design of lower-limb exoskeletons.PLoS One. 2020 Aug 28;15(8):e0231996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231996. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32857774 Free PMC article.
-
Fatigue matters: An intense 10 km run alters frontal and transverse plane joint kinematics in competitive and recreational adult runners.Gait Posture. 2020 Feb;76:277-283. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.11.016. Epub 2019 Dec 13. Gait Posture. 2020. PMID: 31884254
-
Factors Influencing Base of Gait During Running: Consideration of Sex, Speed, Kinematics, and Anthropometrics.J Athl Train. 2020 Dec 1;55(12):1300-1306. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-565-19. J Athl Train. 2020. PMID: 33064810 Free PMC article.
-
Lower extremity joint coupling during running: a current update.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2004 Dec;19(10):983-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.07.005. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2004. PMID: 15531047 Review.
-
Association Between Inter-Limb Asymmetry and Determinants of Middle- and Long-distance Running Performance in Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review.Sports Med Open. 2024 Nov 26;10(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00790-w. Sports Med Open. 2024. PMID: 39589611 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A Data-Driven Approach to Running Gait Assessment Using Inertial Measurement Units.Video J Sports Med. 2022 Sep 13;2(5):26350254221102464. doi: 10.1177/26350254221102464. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct. Video J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 40309461 Free PMC article.
-
The Influence of Quadriceps Strength and Rate of Torque Development on the Recovery of Knee Biomechanics During Running After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2023 Oct;51(12):3171-3178. doi: 10.1177/03635465231194617. Epub 2023 Sep 8. Am J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 37681433 Free PMC article.
-
Use of smart patches by athletes: A concise SWOT analysis.Front Physiol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1055173. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1055173. eCollection 2023. Front Physiol. 2023. PMID: 37035682 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reference biomechanical parameters and natural asymmetry among runners across the age spectrum without a history of running-related injuries.Front Sports Act Living. 2025 May 1;7:1560756. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1560756. eCollection 2025. Front Sports Act Living. 2025. PMID: 40376183 Free PMC article.
-
Running Biomechanics Before Injury and 1 Year After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Division I Collegiate Athletes.Am J Sports Med. 2021 Aug;49(10):2607-2614. doi: 10.1177/03635465211026665. Epub 2021 Jul 14. Am J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 34260290 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Burland JP, Lepley AS, DiStefano LJ, Lepley LK. No shortage of disagreement between biomechanical and clinical hop symmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) . 2019;68:144–50.
-
- Ithurburn MP, Paterno MV, Ford KR, Hewett TE, Schmitt LC. Young athletes with quadriceps femoris strength asymmetry at return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction demonstrate asymmetric single-leg drop-landing mechanics. Am J Sports Med . 2015;43(11):2727–37.
-
- Dai B, Layer J, Vertz C, et al. Baseline assessments of strength and balance performance and bilateral asymmetries in collegiate athletes. J Strength Cond Res . 2019;33(11):3015–29.
-
- O’Malley E, Richter C, King E, et al. Countermovement jump and isokinetic dynamometry as measures of rehabilitation status after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train . 2018;53(7):687–95.
-
- Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE. Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med . 1991;19(5):513–8.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources