Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 1;53(5):945-950.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002558.

Lower Extremity Kinematic and Kinetic Asymmetries during Running

Affiliations

Lower Extremity Kinematic and Kinetic Asymmetries during Running

Mikel Renee Stiffler-Joachim et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. .

Abstract

Purpose: The primary aims of this investigation were to describe the magnitude of asymmetries of common variables during running among healthy athletes and to determine if sex and speed influence magnitudes of asymmetry.

Methods: This study analyzed routinely collected running gait data on healthy Division I collegiate athletes. All athletes had no history of lower extremity surgery, no lower extremity injuries for 3 months before testing, and running data available at 2.68, 2.95, 3.35, 3.80, and 4.47 m·s-1. Asymmetries were calculated for ground reaction forces, spatiotemporal metrics, joint kinematics, and joint kinetics. Separate linear mixed-effects models assessed the influence of sex, speed, and the interaction on asymmetries of interest. z Scores were calculated for significant effects to further assess the magnitude of differences.

Results: Results from 204 athletes were included. The magnitude of asymmetry varied depending on the variable of interest, with asymmetries ≤3° observed for joint kinematics and greater asymmetries observed among joint work asymmetries ranging from 10% to 40%. No significant interactions between sex and speed were observed. Differences in sex and speed were noted; however, the effect sizes were very small based on z score comparison (-0.17 ≤ z ≤ 0.36) and were unlikely to be meaningful.

Conclusions: The magnitude of asymmetry varies considerably depending on the running gait variable. Interpretation of between-limb asymmetry in running mechanics needs to be specific to the variable of interest, whereas sex or running speed seem to be minor factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burland JP, Lepley AS, DiStefano LJ, Lepley LK. No shortage of disagreement between biomechanical and clinical hop symmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) . 2019;68:144–50.
    1. Ithurburn MP, Paterno MV, Ford KR, Hewett TE, Schmitt LC. Young athletes with quadriceps femoris strength asymmetry at return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction demonstrate asymmetric single-leg drop-landing mechanics. Am J Sports Med . 2015;43(11):2727–37.
    1. Dai B, Layer J, Vertz C, et al. Baseline assessments of strength and balance performance and bilateral asymmetries in collegiate athletes. J Strength Cond Res . 2019;33(11):3015–29.
    1. O’Malley E, Richter C, King E, et al. Countermovement jump and isokinetic dynamometry as measures of rehabilitation status after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train . 2018;53(7):687–95.
    1. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE. Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med . 1991;19(5):513–8.

LinkOut - more resources