Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan;17(1):31-46.
doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-00426-5. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

Emerging insights into the comparative effectiveness of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis

Affiliations
Review

Emerging insights into the comparative effectiveness of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis

Eben G Estell et al. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Over the past three decades, the mainstay of treatment for osteoporosis has been antiresorptive agents (such as bisphosphonates), which have been effective with continued administration in lowering fracture risk. However, the clinical landscape has changed as adherence to these medications has declined due to perceived adverse effects. As a result, decreases in hip fracture rates that followed the introduction of bisphosphonates have now levelled off, which is coincident with a decline in the use of the antiresorptive agents. In the past two decades, two types of anabolic agents (including three new drugs), which represent a novel approach to improving bone quality by increasing bone formation, have been approved. These therapies are expected to lead to a new clinical paradigm in which anabolic agents will be used either alone or in combination with antiresorptive agents to build new bone and reduce fracture risk. This Review examines the mechanisms of action for these anabolic agents by detailing their receptor-activating properties for key cell types in the bone and marrow niches. Using these advances in bone biology as context, the comparative effectiveness of these anabolic agents is discussed in relation to other therapeutic options for osteoporosis to better guide their clinical application in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Vestergaard, P., Rejnmark, L. & Mosekilde, L. Increased mortality in patients with a hip fracture–effect of pre-morbid conditions and post-fracture complications. Osteoporos. Int. 18, 1583–159 (2007). - PubMed
    1. Unnanuntana, A., Gladnick, B. P., Donnelly, E. & Lane, J. M. The assessment of fracture risk. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 92, 743–753 (2010).
    1. Wright, N. C. et al. The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. J. Bone Min. Res. 29, 2520–2526 (2014).
    1. Boskey, A. L. & Coleman, R. Aging and bone. J. Dent. Res. 89, 1333–1348 (2010). - PubMed - PMC
    1. Blume, S. W. & Curtis, J. R. Medical costs of osteoporosis in the elderly Medicare population. Osteoporos. Int. 22, 1835–1844 (2011). - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances