Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 29:13:813-821.
doi: 10.2147/JIR.S278911. eCollection 2020.

HPV-16 E2/E6 and POU5F1B as Biomarkers to Determine Cervical High-Grade Squamous Lesions and More

Affiliations

HPV-16 E2/E6 and POU5F1B as Biomarkers to Determine Cervical High-Grade Squamous Lesions and More

Lihua Chen et al. J Inflamm Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: Human papillomavirus-16 (HPV-16) is the most carcinogenic HPV genotype. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of POU5F1B and HPV-16-E2/E6 by cervical cytology specimens to predict the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia two grade and more (CIN2+).

Methods: Finally, 248 patients with HPV-16 single infection were enrolled. Using cytology specimen by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), POU5F1B mRNA and HPV-16-E2/E6 were detected. The relationship of POU5F1B, HPV-16-E2/E6 and CIN2+ were analyzed, and the optimal cut-off values of POU5F1B and HPV-16-E2/E6 to predict CIN2+ were calculated.

Results: The mean HPV-16-E2/E6 decreased significantly with cervical lesions development, especially compared with CIN2+ (p<0.05). And the POU5F1B demonstrated higher expression in CIN2+ than that of normal cervical tissue and CIN1 (p<0.05). What is more, POU5F1B was negatively correlated with HPV-16-E2/E6. It demonstrated that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for POU5F1B (0.9058) was higher than that for HPV-16-E2/E6 (0.8983), and the sensitivity and specificity of POU5F1B in the diagnosis of CIN2+ were higher than HPV-E2/E6. Furthermore, it demonstrated that the POU5F1B had the highest odds ratio (OR= 16.84; 95% CI (8.00-35.46)) for the detection of CIN 2+.

Conclusion: HPV-16-E2/E6≤0.6471 or POU5F1B≥1.0310 in cervical exfoliated cells can be used as a reliable predictor of CIN2+. POU5F1B can be used as a new auxiliary biomarker to determine the HPV infection status and a reliable predictor of CIN2+. The expression of POU5F1B≥1.0310 had the highest OR for the detection of CIN2+.

Keywords: HPV integration; HPV-E2/E6; POU5F1B; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; human papillomavirus type 16.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HPV-E2/E6 and POU5F1B in HPV16-positive cervical cytology. (A) HPV-E2/E6 by the cervical lesion. (B) POU5F1B by the cervical lesion. (C) HPV-E2/E6 by cervical cytology. (D) POU5F1B by cervical cytology.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The physical status of HPV infection in HPV16-positive cervical lesions and ROC curve analysis of the HPV-E2/E6 and POU5F1B for identifying CIN2+ disease. (A) The physical status of HPV infection in HPV16-positive cervical lesions (normal, CIN1, CIN2/3, and SCC). A linear association was found between the status of HPV integration and degrees of cervical lesions. (B) Cut-off, the optimal of HPV-E2/E6 and POU5F1B used to predict CIN2+ calculated according to the ROC curve.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–132. doi:10.3322/caac.21338 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muñoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S, et al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(6):518–527. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa021641 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouvard V, Baan R. A review of human carcinogens—part B: biological agents. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(4):321–322. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70096-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Villiers EM, Fauquet C, Broker TR, Bernard HU, Hausen H. Classification of papillomaviruses. Virology. 2004;324(1):17–27. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2004.03.033 - DOI - PubMed