Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;27(4):738-754.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15435. Epub 2020 Nov 22.

Impact of prior and projected climate change on US Lyme disease incidence

Affiliations

Impact of prior and projected climate change on US Lyme disease incidence

Lisa I Couper et al. Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Lyme disease is the most common vector-borne disease in temperate zones and a growing public health threat in the United States (US). The life cycles of the tick vectors and spirochete pathogen are highly sensitive to climate, but determining the impact of climate change on Lyme disease burden has been challenging due to the complex ecology of the disease and the presence of multiple, interacting drivers of transmission. Here we incorporated 18 years of annual, county-level Lyme disease case data in a panel data statistical model to investigate prior effects of climate variation on disease incidence while controlling for other putative drivers. We then used these climate-disease relationships to project Lyme disease cases using CMIP5 global climate models and two potential climate scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). We find that interannual variation in Lyme disease incidence is associated with climate variation in all US regions encompassing the range of the primary vector species. In all regions, the climate predictors explained less of the variation in Lyme disease incidence than unobserved county-level heterogeneity, but the strongest climate-disease association detected was between warming annual temperatures and increasing incidence in the Northeast. Lyme disease projections indicate that cases in the Northeast will increase significantly by 2050 (23,619 ± 21,607 additional cases), but only under RCP8.5, and with large uncertainty around this projected increase. Significant case changes are not projected for any other region under either climate scenario. The results demonstrate a regionally variable and nuanced relationship between climate change and Lyme disease, indicating possible nonlinear responses of vector ticks and transmission dynamics to projected climate change. Moreover, our results highlight the need for improved preparedness and public health interventions in endemic regions to minimize the impact of further climate change-induced increases in Lyme disease burden.

Keywords: Ixodes pacificus; Ixodes scapularis; Lyme disease; climate change; disease projections; least squares dummy variables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
a) Regional boundaries designated by US Fish & Wildlife Service. These regions were used to analyze spatial variation in the effects of climate conditions on disease outcomes. Map recreated from: https://www.fws.gov/endangered/regions/index.html.Dashed black lines denote the approximate eastern boundary of Ixodes pacificus and western boundary of Ixodes scapularis based on distribution maps created by the CDC. b) Regional time series of log Lyme disease incidence (the number of cases per 100,000 people in the population) from 2000 – 2017. The Mountain Prairie region is not shown here as it was removed from the analysis due to low vector presence at the start of the analysis period.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Projected change in Lyme disease cases by region for 2040 – 2050 and 2090 – 2100 under the a) upper (RCP8.5) and b) moderate (RCP4.5) climate change scenarios. Case changes refer to raw case counts rather than incidence and indicate the average change in cases for a particular decade relative to hindcasted values for 2010 – 2020. Bars represent 95% prediction intervals. Regions are defined in Fig. 1.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Projected change in Lyme disease cases for 2100 shown at the county level under the a) upper (RCP8.5) and b) moderate (RCP4.5) climate change scenarios. Case changes refer to raw case counts rather than incidence and are relative to hindcasted values for 2010 – 2020. All counties within the Mountain Prairie are shown in gray as this region was not included in the analysis. Other counties shown in gray (n = 49) containing missing disease, land cover or climate data.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adrion ER, Aucott J, Lemke KW, and Weiner JP. 2015. Health care costs, utilization and patterns of care following Lyme disease. PLOS ONE 10:e0116767. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen PG, and Fildes R. 2001. Econometric Forecasting Pages 303–362 in Armstrong JS, editor. Principles of Forecasting. Springer; US, Boston, MA.
    1. Armstrong PM, Brunet LR, Spielman A, and Telford III SR. 2001. Risk of Lyme disease: perceptions of residents of a Lone Star tick-infested community. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 79:916–925. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arsnoe IM, Hickling GJ, Ginsberg HS, McElreath R, and Tsao JI. 2015. Different populations of blacklegged tick nymphs exhibit differences in questing behavior that have implications for human Lyme disease risk. PLOS ONE 10:e0127450. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bascle G 2008. Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organization 6:285–327.