Acute and chronic effects of static stretching at 100% versus 120% intensity on flexibility
- PMID: 33151438
- DOI: 10.1007/s00421-020-04539-7
Acute and chronic effects of static stretching at 100% versus 120% intensity on flexibility
Abstract
Purpose: The acute effects of static stretching have been frequently studied, but the chronic effects have not been studied concurrently. Thus, this study aimed to investigate both the acute and chronic effects of static stretching at different intensities on flexibility.
Methods: Twenty-three healthy men were randomly assigned to perform 1 min of static stretching 3 days/week for 4 weeks at 100% intensity (n = 12) or 120% intensity (n = 11). The acute effects of stretching were assessed by measuring the range of motion (ROM), peak passive torque, and passive stiffness before and after every stretching session; the chronic effects of stretching were assessed by measuring these outcomes at baseline and after 2 and 4 weeks of stretching.
Results: Compared with the 100% intensity group, the 120% intensity group had significantly greater acute increases in ROM after all 12 sessions, a significantly greater decrease in passive stiffness after 11 of 12 sessions, and a significantly greater increase in peak passive torque after six of 12 sessions. Regarding the chronic effects, ROM was significantly increased in both groups after 2 and 4 weeks of stretching. Peak passive torque significantly increased in the 100% intensity group after 2 and 4 weeks of stretching, and after 4 weeks in the 120% intensity group.
Conclusion: Stretching at 120% intensity resulted in significantly greater acute improvements in ROM, peak passive torque, and stiffness than stretching at 100% intensity. Four weeks of stretching increased ROM and peak passive torque but did not decrease passive stiffness, regardless of the stretching intensity.
Keywords: Acute effects; Chronic effects; Flexibility; Passive stiffness; Static stretching; Stretching intensity.
Similar articles
-
Influence of High Intensity 20-Second Static Stretching on the Flexibility and Strength of Hamstrings.J Sports Sci Med. 2020 May 1;19(2):429-435. eCollection 2020 Jun. J Sports Sci Med. 2020. PMID: 32390737 Free PMC article.
-
Acute Effects of the Different Intensity of Static Stretching on Flexibility and Isometric Muscle Force.J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Dec;31(12):3403-3410. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001752. J Strength Cond Res. 2017. PMID: 27984497 Clinical Trial.
-
Static Stretching Intensity Does Not Influence Acute Range of Motion, Passive Torque, and Muscle Architecture.J Sport Rehabil. 2020 Jan 1;29(1):1-6. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2018-0178. J Sport Rehabil. 2020. PMID: 30300070
-
Effects of stretching intensity on range of motion and muscle stiffness: A narrative review.J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022 Oct;32:68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 Apr 20. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022. PMID: 36180161 Review.
-
Critical evaluation and recalculation of current systematic reviews with meta-analysis on the effects of acute and chronic stretching on passive properties and passive peak torque.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 Nov;124(11):3153-3173. doi: 10.1007/s00421-024-05564-6. Epub 2024 Jul 27. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024. PMID: 39066912 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Improvements in Flexibility Depend on Stretching Duration.Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Jan 1;16(4):83-94. doi: 10.70252/LBOU2008. eCollection 2023. Int J Exerc Sci. 2023. PMID: 37113511 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison Between High- and Low-Intensity Static Stretching Training Program on Active and Passive Properties of Plantar Flexors.Front Physiol. 2021 Dec 17;12:796497. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.796497. eCollection 2021. Front Physiol. 2021. PMID: 34975544 Free PMC article.
-
The Effects of Static Stretching Intensity on Range of Motion and Strength: A Systematic Review.J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 Mar 24;8(2):37. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8020037. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023. PMID: 37092369 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What We Do Not Know About Stretching in Healthy Athletes: A Scoping Review with Evidence Gap Map from 300 Trials.Sports Med. 2024 Jun;54(6):1517-1551. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02002-7. Epub 2024 Mar 8. Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 38457105 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Intermittent and Continuous Static Stretching on Range of Motion and Musculotendinous Viscoelastic Properties Based on a Duration-Matched Protocol.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 11;18(20):10632. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010632. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34682378 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Anderson B, Anderson J (1980) Stretching. Shelter Publications, USA
-
- Apostolopoulos N, Metsios GS, Flouris AD, Koutedakis Y, Wyon MA (2015) The relevance of stretch intensity and position—a systematic review. Front Psychol 6:1128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01128 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Bandy WD, Irion JM (1994) The effect of time on static stretch on the flexibility of the hamstring muscles. Phys Ther 74:845–850 ((discussion 850-842)) - DOI
-
- Behm DG, Blazevich AJ, Kay AD, McHugh M (2016) Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab (Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme) 41:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0235 - DOI
-
- Ben M, Harvey LA (2010) Regular stretch does not increase muscle extensibility: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports 20:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00926.x - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources