Combining convolutional neural networks and cognitive models to predict novel object recognition in humans
- PMID: 33151718
- DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000968
Combining convolutional neural networks and cognitive models to predict novel object recognition in humans
Abstract
Object representations from convolutional neural network (CNN) models of computer vision (LeCun, Bengio, & Hinton, 2015) were used to drive a cognitive model of decision making, the linear ballistic accumulator (LBA) model (Brown & Heathcote, 2008), to predict errors and response times (RTs) in a novel object recognition task in humans. CNNs have become very successful at visual tasks like classifying objects in real-world images (e.g., He, Zhang, Ren, & Sun, 2015; Krizhevsky, Sutskever, & Hinton, 2012). We asked whether object representations learned by CNNs previously trained on a large corpus of natural images could be used to predict performance recognizing novel objects the network has never been trained on; we used novel Greebles, Ziggerins, and Sheinbugs that have been used in a number of previous object recognition studies. We specifically investigated whether a model combining high-level CNN representations of these novel objects could be used to drive an LBA model of decision making to account for errors and RTs in a same-different matching task (from Richler et al., 2019). Combining linearly transformed CNN object representations with the LBA provided reasonable accounts of performance not only on average, but at the individual-participant level and the item level as well. We frame the findings in the context of growing interest in using CNN models to understand visual object representations and the promise of using CNN representations to extend cognitive models to explain more complex aspects of human behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Similar articles
-
From convolutional neural networks to models of higher-level cognition (and back again).Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 Dec;1505(1):55-78. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14593. Epub 2021 Mar 22. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021. PMID: 33754368 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Large-Scale, High-Resolution Comparison of the Core Visual Object Recognition Behavior of Humans, Monkeys, and State-of-the-Art Deep Artificial Neural Networks.J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 15;38(33):7255-7269. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0388-18.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 13. J Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 30006365 Free PMC article.
-
A novel feature-scrambling approach reveals the capacity of convolutional neural networks to learn spatial relations.Neural Netw. 2023 Oct;167:400-414. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2023.08.021. Epub 2023 Aug 18. Neural Netw. 2023. PMID: 37673027 Free PMC article.
-
A failure to learn object shape geometry: Implications for convolutional neural networks as plausible models of biological vision.Vision Res. 2021 Dec;189:81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Oct 8. Vision Res. 2021. PMID: 34634753
-
Capturing the objects of vision with neural networks.Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Sep;5(9):1127-1144. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01194-6. Epub 2021 Sep 20. Nat Hum Behav. 2021. PMID: 34545237 Review.
Cited by
-
High-variability training does not enhance generalization in the prototype-distortion paradigm.Mem Cognit. 2024 Jul;52(5):1017-1032. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01516-1. Epub 2024 Jan 16. Mem Cognit. 2024. PMID: 38228994
-
Deep learning-based prediction of tumor aggressiveness in RCC using multiparametric MRI: a pilot study.Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 May;57(5):1365-1379. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04300-5. Epub 2024 Dec 13. Int Urol Nephrol. 2025. PMID: 39671158 Free PMC article.
-
From convolutional neural networks to models of higher-level cognition (and back again).Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 Dec;1505(1):55-78. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14593. Epub 2021 Mar 22. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021. PMID: 33754368 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of chest movements while sitting on Navon task performance and stress levels.BMC Digit Health. 2023;1(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s44247-023-00011-6. Epub 2023 Apr 13. BMC Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 38014369 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing perceptual judgments in large multimodal models and humans.Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jun 19;57(7):203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02728-w. Behav Res Methods. 2025. PMID: 40536604 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources