Health economic design for cost, cost-effectiveness and simulation analyses in the HEALing Communities Study
- PMID: 33152672
- PMCID: PMC7532345
- DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108336
Health economic design for cost, cost-effectiveness and simulation analyses in the HEALing Communities Study
Abstract
Background: The HEALing Communities Study (HCS) is designed to implement and evaluate the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention, a conceptually driven framework to assist communities in selecting and adopting evidence-based practices to reduce opioid overdose deaths. The goal of the HCS is to produce generalizable information for policy makers and community stakeholders seeking to implement CTH or a similar community intervention. To support this objective, one aim of the HCS is a health economics study (HES), the results of which will inform decisions around fiscal feasibility and sustainability relevant to other community settings.
Methods: The HES is integrated into the HCS design: an unblinded, multisite, parallel arm, cluster randomized, wait list-controlled trial of the CTH intervention implemented in 67 communities in four U.S. states: Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio. The objectives of the HES are to estimate the economic costs to communities of implementing and sustaining CTH; estimate broader societal costs associated with CTH; estimate the cost-effectiveness of CTH for overdose deaths avoided; and use simulation modeling to evaluate the short- and long-term health and economic impact of CTH, including future overdose deaths avoided and quality-adjusted life years saved, and to develop a simulation policy tool for communities that seek to implement CTH or a similar community intervention.
Discussion: The HCS offers an unprecedented opportunity to conduct health economics research on solutions to the opioid crisis and to increase understanding of the impact and value of complex, community-level interventions.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Economic evaluation; HEALing Communities Study; Helping to end addiction long term; Opioid use disorder; Overdose; Simulation.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no declarations of interest.
References
-
- Barbosa C., Dowd W.N., Zarkin G. Economic evaluation of interventions to address opioid misuse: a systematic review of methods used in simulation modeling studies. Value in Health. 2020 - PubMed
-
- Barocas J.A., Morgan J.R., Fiellin D.A., Schackman B.R., Eftekhari Yazdi G., Stein M.D., Freedberg K.A., Linas B.P. Cost-effectiveness of integrating buprenorphine-naloxone treatment for opioid use disorder into clinical care for persons with HIV/hepatitis C co-infection who inject opioids. Int. J. Drug Policy. 2019;72:160–168. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.05.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Briggs A., Sculpher M., Claxton K. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 2006. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical