Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1987 Nov;34(6):601-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF03010519.

The epidural test dose in obstetrics: is it necessary?

Affiliations
Review

The epidural test dose in obstetrics: is it necessary?

S L Dain et al. Can J Anaesth. 1987 Nov.

Abstract

One must distinguish between what is medically safe and what is legally safe. The authors have the impression that in order to be "legally safe" one must perform a test dose. This is despite the fact that it has not been conclusively shown that the use of test doses improve the safety margin of epidural anaesthesia, when administered by a competent person, with the proper resuscitative equipment immediately available. Until a controlled study is performed, test doses should be done for continuous epidural anaesthesia with the understanding that they are neither 100 per cent sensitive nor specific in preventing complications. It is however one more manoeuvre that may be useful in recognizing some of the patients with accidental subarachnoid placement of epidural catheters. The literature suggests that lidocaine 1.5 per cent in dextrose 7.5 per cent should be the test dose of choice in obstetric epidural anaesthesia in an amount known to produce spinal anaesthesia (30-50 mg). The use of epinephrine in test doses in unpremedicated healthy women in active labour is neither sensitive nor specific in signalling intravascular injection, and it may also be detrimental to fetal wellbeing. Epinephrine 15 micrograms as a test dose for intravenous injection appears to create more problems than it solves.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Anaesth. 1977 Jan;49(1):11-17 - PubMed
    1. Anaesthesia. 1985 Dec;40(12):1219-25 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 1981 Feb;54(2):131-5 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 1986 Dec;65(6):633-6 - PubMed
    1. Anesth Analg. 1980 Oct;59(10):811 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources