Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 5;21(1):913.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04736-x.

Effects of strategies to improve general practitioner-nurse collaboration and communication in regard to hospital admissions of nursing home residents (interprof ACT): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Christiane Müller  1 , Berit Hesjedal-Streller  2 , Nina Fleischmann  3 , Britta Tetzlaff  4 , Tina Mallon  4 , Martin Scherer  4 , Sascha Köpke  5 , Katrin Balzer  6 , Linda Gärtner  6 , Indre Maurer  7 , Tim Friede  8 , Hans-Helmut König  9 , Eva Hummers  2
Affiliations

Effects of strategies to improve general practitioner-nurse collaboration and communication in regard to hospital admissions of nursing home residents (interprof ACT): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Christiane Müller et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: In Germany, up to 50% of nursing home residents are admitted to a hospital at least once a year. It is often unclear whether this is beneficial or even harmful. Successful interprofessional collaboration and communication involving general practitioners (GPs) and nurses may improve medical care of nursing home residents. In the previous interprof study, the six-component intervention package interprof ACT was developed to facilitate collaboration of GPs and nurses in nursing homes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the interprof ACT intervention.

Methods: This multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial compares nursing homes receiving the interprof ACT intervention package for a duration of 12 months (e.g. comprising appointment of mutual contact persons, shared goal setting, standardised GPs' home visits) with a control group (care as usual). A total of 34 nursing homes are randomised, and overall 680 residents recruited. The intervention package is presented in a kick-off meeting to GPs, nurses, residents/relatives or their representatives. Nursing home nurses act as change agents to support local adaption and implementation of the intervention measures. Primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of hospitalisation within 12 months. Secondary outcomes include admissions to hospital, days admitted to hospital, use of other medical services, prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication and quality of life. Additionally, health economic and a mixed methods process evaluation will be performed.

Discussion: This study investigates a complex intervention tailored to local needs of nursing homes. Outcomes reflect the healthcare and health of nursing home residents, as well as the feasibility of the intervention package and its impact on interprofessional communication and collaboration. Because of its systematic development and its flexible nature, interprof ACT is expected to be viable for large-scale implementation in routine care services regardless of local organisational conditions and resources available for medical care for nursing home residents on a regular basis. Recommendations will be made for an improved organisation of primary care for nursing home residents. In addition, the results may provide important knowledge and data for the development and evaluation of further strategies to improve outpatient care for elderly care-receivers.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03426475 . Initially registered on 7 February 2018.

Keywords: Interprofessional relations; Nursing homes; Physician-nurse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart providing an overview of important trial steps
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dwyer R, Gabbe B, Stoelwinder JU, et al. A systematic review of outcomes following emergency transfer to hospital for residents of aged care facilities. Age Ageing. 2014;43(6):759–766. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu117. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fogg C, Griffiths P, Meredith P, Bridges J. Hospital outcomes of older people with cognitive impairment: an integrative review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;26;33(9):1177–97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerster B in Günster C, Bartholomeyczik S . Versorgungs-Report 2012: Schwerpunkt: Gesundheit im Alter. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2012.
    1. Schneekloth U, von Törne I in: MuGIV: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen selbständiger Lebensführung (MuG IV) Integrierter Abschlussbericht, Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend, 2008, https://www.bmfsfj.de/blob/78928/9465bec83edaf4027f25bb5433ea702e/abschl.... cited 23.04.2020.
    1. Hoffmann F, Schmiemann G. Influence of age and sex on hospitalization of nursing home residents: a cross-sectional study from Germany. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2008-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data