Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov;17(11S):S403-S414.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.009.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction

Affiliations
Review

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction

Expert Panel on Breast Imaging et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Mastectomy may be performed to treat breast cancer or as a prophylactic approach in women with a high risk of developing breast cancer. In addition, mastectomies may be performed with or without reconstruction. Reconstruction approaches differ and may be autologous, involving a transfer of tissue (skin, subcutaneous fat, and muscle) from other parts of the body to the chest wall. Reconstruction may also involve implants. Implant reconstruction may occur as a single procedure or as multistep procedures with initial use of an adjustable tissue expander allowing the mastectomy tissues to be stretched without compromising blood supply. Ultimately, a full-volume implant will be placed. Reconstructions with a combination of autologous and implant reconstruction may also be performed. Other techniques such as autologous fat grafting may be used to refine both implant and flap-based reconstruction. This review of imaging in the setting of mastectomy with or without reconstruction summarizes the literature and makes recommendations based on available evidence. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Keywords: AUC; Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; Autologous; Breast cancer; Implant; Mastectomy; Reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Jochelson reports that she is a speaker for GE and is a consultant with Bayer and Endomagnetics. The other authors state that they have no conflict of interest related to the material discussed in this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Green LA, Karow JA, Toman JE, Lostumbo A, Xie K. Review of breast augmentation and reconstruction for the radiologist with emphasis on MRI. Clin Imaging 2018;47:101–17. - PubMed
    1. Kummerow KL, Du L, Penson DF, Shyr Y, Hooks MA. Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg 2015;150:9–16. - PubMed
    1. Panchal H, Pilewskie ML, Sheckter CC, et al. National trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with locally advanced breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2019;119:79–87. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zakhireh J, Fowble B, Esserman LJ. Application of screening principles to the reconstructed breast. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:173–80. - PubMed
    1. Medina-Franco H, Vasconez LO, Fix RJ, et al. Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg 2002;235:814–9. - PMC - PubMed