Prognostic Value of the Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Assessed by Fully Automated Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: A Direct Comparison of Analyses Using Right Ventricular-Focused Views versus Apical Four-Chamber Views

Abstract

Background: Right ventricular (RV) three-dimensional echocardiographic (3DE) data sets are acquired from either the RV-focused view (RVFV) or the apical four-chamber view (4CV). The prognostic value of 3DE RV ejection fraction (RVEF) was investigated using fully automated RV quantification software, and how measurement values with 3DE data sets from the RVFV compare with those from the 4CV was determined.

Methods: One hundred seventy-four patients who had undergone both cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and 3DE imaging were retrospectively selected. RV 3DE data sets were acquired from both the RVFV and the 4CV and were analyzed separately using fully automated RV quantification software. Primary end points were cardiac events, including cardiac death, heart failure requiring hospitalization, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

Results: The feasibility of RVEF measurements on 3DE imaging from the RVFV and 4CV was 92% and 92%, respectively. There was good correlation (r = 0.83) and small bias (0.3%) between RVEF from the RVFV and that from the 4CV. Similar results were obtained when only data from patients whose echocardiograms had poor image quality in one or both views were analyzed (r = 0.83, bias = 1.7%, n = 78). Although fully automated analysis in both the RVFV and 4CV significantly underestimated RV volumes compared with CMR, neither measurement differed significantly for RVEF compared with CMR. During a median follow-up period of 12.5 months, 21 patients experienced primary end points. RVEF assessed by CMR and 3DE imaging was significantly associated with cardiac events. RVEF using fully automated analysis had a significant association with cardiac events, even in patients with poor image quality (RVFV: hazard ratio, 0.90 [P = .009, n = 44]; 4CV: hazard ratio, 0.90 [P = .009, n = 68]).

Conclusions: RV 3DE data sets from the RVFV and 4CV yielded similar RVEF values using fully automated software. RVEFs from both approaches had significant association with outcomes. Thus, both provide accurate information regarding RV function and risk for adverse outcomes.

Keywords: Four-chamber view; Fully automated software; Right ventricular ejection fraction; Right ventricular focused view; Three-dimensional echocardiography.