Patient needs and priorities for patient navigator programmes in chronic kidney disease: a workshop report

Chandana Guha^{1

2}, P Lopez-Vargas^{3

2}, Angela Ju^{3

2}, Talia Gutman^{3

2}, Nicole Jane Scholes-Robertson^{3

2}, Amanda Baumgart^{3

2}, Germaine Wong^{3

2}, Jonathan Craig⁴, Tim Usherwood⁵, Sharon Reid³, Vanessa Cullen⁶, Martin Howell^{3

2}, Rabia Khalid^{3

2}, Armando Teixeira-Pinto^{3

2}, Kate Wyburn⁷, Shaundeep Sen⁸, Tanya Smolonogov⁹, Vincent W Lee², Gopala K Rangan^{10

11}, Andrea Matus Gonzales^{3

2}, Allison Tong^{3

2}; PAVE-CKD workshop investigators

Affiliations

¹ Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia chandana.guha@sydney.edu.au.
² Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
³ Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁴ College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
⁵ Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁶ Forward Thinking Design, Quakers Hill, New South Wales, Australia.
⁷ Collaborative Transplant Research Group, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Bosch Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁸ Department of Renal Medicine, Concord Repatriation Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia.
⁹ Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
¹⁰ Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
¹¹ Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

PMID: 33154061
PMCID: PMC7646342
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040617

Patient needs and priorities for patient navigator programmes in chronic kidney disease: a workshop report

Chandana Guha et al. BMJ Open. 2020.

. 2020 Nov 5;10(11):e040617.

doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040617.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia chandana.guha@sydney.edu.au.
² Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
³ Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁴ College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
⁵ Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁶ Forward Thinking Design, Quakers Hill, New South Wales, Australia.
⁷ Collaborative Transplant Research Group, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Bosch Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁸ Department of Renal Medicine, Concord Repatriation Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia.
⁹ Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
¹⁰ Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
¹¹ Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

PMID: 33154061
PMCID: PMC7646342
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040617

Abstract

Background and objective: Patients with early chronic kidney disease (CKD) face challenges in accessing healthcare, including delays in diagnosis, fragmented speciality care and lack of tailored education and psychosocial support. Patient navigator programmes have the potential to improve the process of care and outcomes. The objective of this study is to describe the experiences of patients on communication, access of care and self-management and their perspectives on patient navigator programmes in early CKD.

Design, setting and participants: We convened a workshop in Australia with 19 patients with CKD (all stages including CKD Stage 1 to 5 not on dialysis, 5D (dialysis), and 5T (transplant)) and five caregivers. All of them were over 18 years and English-speaking. Transcripts from the workshop were analysed thematically.

Results: Four themes that captured discussions were: lost in the ambiguity of symptoms and management, battling roadblocks while accessing care, emotionally isolated after diagnosis and re-establishing lifestyle and forward planning. Five themes that focussed on patient navigator programmes were: trust and credibility, respecting patient choices and readiness to accept the programme, using accessible language to promote the programme, offering multiple ways to engage and communicate and maintaining confidentiality and privacy. Of the 17 features identified as important for a patient navigator programme, the top five were delivery of education, psychosocial support, lifestyle modification, communication and decision-making support and facilitating care.

Conclusion: Patient navigator services can address gaps in services around health literacy, communication, psychosocial support and coordination across multiple healthcare settings. In comparison to the existing navigator programmes, and other services that are aimed at addressing these gaps, credible, accessible and flexible patient navigator programmes for patients with early CKD, that support education, decision-making, access to care and self-management designed in partnership with patients, may be more acceptable to patients.

Keywords: Chronic renal failure; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

1. Lopez-Vargas PA, Tong A, Sureshkumar P, et al. . Prevention, detection and management of early chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Nephrology 2013;18:592–604. 10.1111/nep.12119 - DOI - PubMed
1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Chronic kidney disease in adults: assessment and management. NICE guideline (CG182). London: Author; 2014. - PubMed
1. Eckardt K-U, Coresh J, Devuyst O, et al. . Evolving importance of kidney disease: from subspecialty to global health burden. Lancet 2013;382:158–69. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60439-0 - DOI - PubMed
1. Green JA, Boulware LE. Patient education and support during CKD transitions: when the possible becomes probable. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2016;23:231–9. 10.1053/j.ackd.2016.04.004 - DOI - PubMed
1. Danforth KN, Hahn EE, Slezak JM, et al. . Follow-Up of abnormal estimated GFR results within a large integrated health care delivery system: a mixed-methods study. Am J Kidney Dis 2019;74:589–600. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.05.003 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Patient needs and priorities for patient navigator programmes in chronic kidney disease: a workshop report

Affiliations

Patient needs and priorities for patient navigator programmes in chronic kidney disease: a workshop report

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement

References

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Medical