Evaluation of the uptake and delivery of the NHS Health Check programme in England, using primary care data from 9.5 million people: a cross-sectional study
- PMID: 33154064
- PMCID: PMC7646358
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042963
Evaluation of the uptake and delivery of the NHS Health Check programme in England, using primary care data from 9.5 million people: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the uptake and outputs of the National Health Service Health Check (NHSHC) programme in England.
Design: Observational study.
Setting: National primary care data extracted directly by NHS Digital from 90% of general practices (GP) in England.
Participants: Individuals aged 40-74 years, invited to or completing a NHSHC between 2012 and 2017, defined using primary care Read codes.
Intervention: The NHSHC, a structured assessment of non-communicable disease risk factors and 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, with recommendations for behavioural change support and therapeutic interventions.
Results: During the 5-year cycle, 9 694 979 individuals were offered an NHSHC and 5 102 758 (52.6%) took up the offer. There was geographical variation in uptake between local authorities across England ranging from 25.1% to 84.7%. Invitation methods changed over time to incorporate greater digitalisation, opportunistic delivery and delivery by third-party providers.The population offered an NHSHC resembled the English population in ethnicity and deprivation characteristics. Attendees were more likely to be older and women, but were similar in terms of ethnicity and deprivation, compared with non-attendees. Among attendees, risk factor prevalence reflected population survey estimates for England. Where a CVD risk score was documented, 25.9% had a 10-year CVD risk ≥10%, of which 20.3% were prescribed a statin. Advice, information and referrals were coded as delivered to over 2.5 million individuals identified to have risk factors.
Conclusion: This national analysis of the NHSHC programme, using primary care data from over 9.5 million individuals offered a check, reveals an uptake rate of over 50% and no significant evidence of inequity by ethnicity or deprivation. To maximise the anticipated value of the NHSHC, we suggest continued action is needed to invite more eligible people for a check, reduce geographical variation in uptake, prioritise engagement with non-attendees and promote greater use of evidence-based interventions especially where risk is identified.
Keywords: preventive medicine; public health; vascular medicine.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet 2018;392:1736–88. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Department of Health Putting prevention first: vascular checks, risk assessment and management, 2008. Available: https://www.healthcheck.nhs.uk/seecmsfile/?id=1302 [Accessed Dec 2019].
-
- GBD 2017 Risk Factor Collaborators Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet 2018;392:1923–94. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32225-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Department of Health Economic modelling for vascular vhecks, 2009. Available: www.healthcheck.nhs.uk/document.php?o=225 [Accessed Feb 2020].
-
- Public Health England NHS health check best practice guidance 2019. Available: https://www.healthcheck.nhs.uk/seecmsfile/?id=1474 [Accessed Feb 2020].
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources