Should practice and policy be revised to allow for risk-proportional payment to human challenge study participants?
- PMID: 33154089
- PMCID: PMC7719901
- DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106900
Should practice and policy be revised to allow for risk-proportional payment to human challenge study participants?
Keywords: clinical trials; ethics; public health ethics; research ethics.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment in
-
Fair go: pay research participants properly or not at all.J Med Ethics. 2020 Dec;46(12):837-839. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107060. Epub 2020 Nov 24. J Med Ethics. 2020. PMID: 33234546 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model.J Med Ethics. 2020 Dec;46(12):815-826. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106438. Epub 2020 Sep 25. J Med Ethics. 2020. PMID: 32978306 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Oguti B, Gibani M, Darlow C, et al. Factors influencing participation in controlled human infection models: a pooled analysis from six enteric fever studies. Wellcome Open Res 2019;4(153). 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15469.1 - DOI
-
- Gelinas L, Largent EA, Cohen IG, et al. A framework for ethical payment to research participants. Mass Medical Soc 2018. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources