Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Jul-Dec;38(3 & 4):385-389.
doi: 10.4103/ijmm.IJMM_20_279.

Comparison of two real-time polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome-CoV-2 from combined nasopharyngeal-throat swabs

Oves Siddiqui  1 , Vikas Manchanda  1 , Abhishek Yadav  1 , Tanu Sagar  1 , Sanchita Tuteja  1 , Nazia Nagi  1 , Sonal Saxena  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of two real-time polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome-CoV-2 from combined nasopharyngeal-throat swabs

Oves Siddiqui et al. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2020 Jul-Dec.

Abstract

Context: In the absence of effective treatment or vaccine, the current strategy for the prevention of further transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection is early diagnosis and isolation of cases. The diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 is done by detecting viral RNA in the nasopharyngeal and throat swabs by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Many commercial assays are now available for performing the PCR assay.

Aims: The aim was to evaluate the performance of the SD Biosensor nCoV real-time detection kit with the real-time PCR kit provided by the Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Virology (ICMR-NIV), Pune (NIV Protocol).

Subjects and methods: A total of 253 pairs of nasopharyngeal-oropharyngeal swabs combined in a single viral transport medium were tested for viral RNA by both the protocols. The sensitivity and specificity of the SD Biosensor were calculated considering the ICMR-NIV kit as the gold standard. Matched pairs of recorded cycle threshold values (Ct values) were compared by Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results: Concordant COVID-19 negative and positive PCR results were reported for 113 and 77 samples, respectively. The SD Biosensor kit additionally detected 62 cases, which were found negative by the NIV protocol. In all discordant positive results by the SD Biosensor kit, the average Ct values were higher than the concordant positive results. A total of forty samples tested positive for E gene by SD Biosensor and having Ct values <25 had 100% concordance with NIV protocol results and 39 samples tested positive for E gene by SD Biosensor having Ct value >32 were all found negative by the NIV protocol.

Conclusions: The results highlight the need for careful evaluation of commercial kits before being deployed for screening of COVID-19 infections.

Keywords: COVID-19; molecular diagnostics; real-time polymerase chain reaction; severe acute respiratory syndrome-CoV-2; test comparison.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chan JF, To KK, Tse H, Jin DY, Yuen KY. Interspecies transmission and emergence of novel viruses: Lessons from bats and birds. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:544–555. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zumla A, Chan JF, Azhar EI, Hui DS, Yuen KY. Coronaviruses – Drug discovery and therapeutic options. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15:327–347. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Su S, Wong G, Shi W, Liu J, Lai ACK, Zhou J. Epidemiology, genetic recombination, and pathogenesis of coronaviruses. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:490–502. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Falsey AR, Walsh EE. Novel coronavirus and severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003;361:1312–1313. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christian MD, Poutanen SM, Loutfy MR, Muller MP, Low DE. Severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1420–1427. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types