Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Aug 19;27(9):1371-1378.
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa283.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Outcomes Following Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent C. difficile Infection

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Outcomes Following Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent C. difficile Infection

Jessica R Allegretti et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a clinical challenge. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has emerged as a recurrent CDI therapy. Anecdotal concerns exist regarding worsening of IBD activity; however, prospective data among IBD patients are limited.

Methods: Secondary analysis from an open-label, prospective, multicenter cohort study among IBD patients with 2 or more CDI episodes was performed. Participants underwent a single FMT by colonoscopy (250 mL, healthy universal donor). Secondary IBD-related outcomes included rate of de novo IBD flares, worsening IBD, and IBD improvement-all based on Mayo or Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) scores. Stool samples were collected for microbiome and targeted metabolomic profiling.

Results: Fifty patients enrolled in the study, among which 15 had Crohn's disease (mean HBI, 5.8 ± 3.4) and 35 had ulcerative colitis (mean partial Mayo score, 4.2 ± 2.1). Overall, 49 patients received treatment. Among the Crohn's disease cohort, 73.3% (11 of 15) had IBD improvement, and 4 (26.6%) had no disease activity change. Among the ulcerative colitis cohort, 62% (22 of 34) had IBD improvement, 29.4% (11 of 34) had no change, and 4% (1 of 34) experienced a de novo flare. Alpha diversity significantly increased post-FMT, and ulcerative colitis patients became more similar to the donor than Crohn's disease patients (P = 0.04).

Conclusion: This prospective trial assessing FMT in IBD-CDI patients suggests IBD outcomes are better than reported in retrospective studies.

Keywords: Clostridioides difficile infection; Crohn’s disease; butyrate; fecal microbiota transplantation; inflammatory bowel disease; microbiome; ulcerative colitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Alpha diversity after (A) first FMT and (B) in patients receiving second FMT. Increases were significant after first FMT for all patients pooled (P < 1e-17) and when stratified by IBD subtype (UC P < 1e-13; CD P < 1e-5).
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Similarity to the donor post-FMT measured by Jensen-Shannon Divergence, stratified by donor and IBD subtype. Data from 2 patients receiving other donors not shown. Change was measured as difference in similarity post-FMT vs baseline and was significantly different between UC and CD patients (all patients, P = 0.040; donor 1 and 2 only, P = 0.038, 2-sided t test). Differences between the subtypes were largest among recipients of donor 2.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Log fold-change in primary and secondary bile acids following FMT. For each patient, all values post-FMT were averaged, then divided by the patient’s baseline. Significant changes are indicated (*indicates P < 0.05, **indicates P < 0.005, 2-sided t test on log abundance).
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Associations between changes in fecal butyrate and major phyla abundances. Changes were measured between baseline and week 12 for 2 major phyla: Firmicutes (left) and Proteobacteria (right). Spearman correlations were significant for Firmicutes across all patients (P = 0.021) and when stratified by IBD subtype (UC, P = 0.037; CD, P = 0.039).

References

    1. Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al. ; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:431–455. - PubMed
    1. Zar FA, Bakkanagari SR, Moorthi KM, et al. . A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:302–307. - PubMed
    1. Ananthakrishnan AN. Clostridium difficile infection: epidemiology, risk factors and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8:17–26. - PubMed
    1. Pépin J, Valiquette L, Alary ME, et al. . Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a region of Quebec from 1991 to 2003: a changing pattern of disease severity. Cmaj. 2004;171:466–472. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rupnik M, Wilcox MH, Gerding DN. Clostridium difficile infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:526–536. - PubMed

Publication types