Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;136(6):1221-1226.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004150.

Negative Patient Reviews and Online Defamation: A Guide for the Obstetrician-Gynecologist

Christopher P Moutos  1 , Kajal Verma, John Y Phelps
Affiliations

Negative Patient Reviews and Online Defamation: A Guide for the Obstetrician-Gynecologist

Christopher P Moutos et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Physician review websites can serve as a means for patients to address physician actions, both good and bad. At times, patient reviews may be negative and perceived as defamatory. Yet there are specific legal requirements that must be met for an online review to be considered defamatory. Prior cases indicate that pursuing a defamation lawsuit, although appropriate in some circumstances, is oftentimes a difficult and futile endeavor. To avoid litigation, physicians can take proactive approaches to address questionable reviews and to bolster their online reputations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Great Wall Med. P.C. v Levine, 2018 NY Misc (NY Sup Ct 2018).
    1. Segal J, Sacopulos MJ, Rivera DJ. Legal remedies for online defamation of physicians. J Leg Med 2009;30:349–88.
    1. Lee SD. “I hate my doctor”: reputation, defamation, and physician-review websites. Health matrix. J Law-Medicine 2013;23:573–606.
    1. A provision of the Communications Decency Act, 47 USC §230 (1996).
    1. Dendrite International v Doe No. 3, 342 NJ Super 134, 775 A2d 756 (App Div 2001).