Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;30(4):967-981.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02685-1. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

A systematic review of self-care measures for adolescents with health needs

Xu Jiang  1   2 , Kelsey Walker  3 , Allyson K Topps  3
Affiliations

A systematic review of self-care measures for adolescents with health needs

Xu Jiang et al. Qual Life Res. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: The current study sought to review instruments measuring self-care for adolescents with health needs to provide a summary of the tools available for conducting self-care research in this population.

Method: Studies were mainly identified through searches in three electronic bibliographic databases (i.e., PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMed) and additional sources to retrieve relevant articles. Studies were included if they focused on self-care measures, included samples of adolescents (ages 10-19), were published in English peer-reviewed journals, dissertations, and from the years 1980 through 2020. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) was used to assess the methodological quality of each study and evaluate the measurement quality based on available studies.

Results: A total of ten scales from 12 papers were identified to meet the search criteria and designed for adolescent patients with three types of health needs, including diabetes, cystic fibrosis, and others (female care and nutrition). There is a lack of a clear and comprehensive definition of self-care for different health needs. The dominant focus of the scales was the behavioral aspect of self-care (e.g., adherence to medication regimen), with only a few scales (e.g., female care) assessing the psychological aspect of self-care. The quality of the psychometric properties of the scales varied greatly.

Conclusions: Results highlighted the need for more research on developing and validating self-care measures for adolescents with health needs. The unique developmental characteristics of adolescents should be adequately considered, and the psychological aspect of self-care should be incorporated in measurement development.

Keywords: Adolescents; Instruments; Measures; Scales; Self-care; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wilkinson, A., & Whitehead, L. (2009). Evolution of the concept of self-care and implications for nurses: a literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(8), 1143–1147. - DOI
    1. Sidani, S. (2011). Self-care. In Doran D. M. (Ed.), Nursing outcomes: the state of the science (2nd ed.) (pp. 79–124). Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    1. Lewin, A. B., La Greca, A. M., Geffken, G. R., Williams, R. B., Duke, D. C., Storch, E. A., & Silverstein, J. H. (2009). Validity and reliability of an adolescent and parent rating scale of type 1 diabetes adherence behaviors: the self-care inventory (SCI). Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34, 999–1007. - DOI
    1. Patton, S. R., Graham, J. L., Varlotta, L., & Holsclaw, D., Jr. (2003). Measuring self-care independence in children with cystic fibrosis: the self-care independence scale (SCIS). Pediatric Pulmonology, 36, 123–130. - DOI
    1. Galvan, A., Hare, T., Voss, H., Glover, G., & Casey, B. J. (2007). Risk-taking and the adolescent brain: who is at risk? Developmental Science, 10, F8–F14. - DOI

Publication types