Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;52(3):451-457.
doi: 10.1111/imj.15127.

Specialist haematology consultation services in regional Western Australia: evaluating a model combining telehealth and onsite clinics

Kirsten Auret  1 , Terri Pikora  1 , Melissa Pola  2
Affiliations

Specialist haematology consultation services in regional Western Australia: evaluating a model combining telehealth and onsite clinics

Kirsten Auret et al. Intern Med J. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Models of care that increase specialist medical services to regional or remote patients are being explored worldwide. Many of the models include telehealth (also called telemedicine or video-conferencing consultations) alone or in combination with traditional face-to-face clinic visits.

Aim: To report the experience of patients using telehealth consultation and costs associated with delivering the service in a Regional Cancer Centre over a 12-month period.

Methods: Patients attending a Great Southern haematology clinic between September 2018 and July 2019 were invited to complete a brief questionnaire about their demographic and diagnosis details. Those attending a telehealth clinic were invited to complete a Tele-Haematology Satisfaction Questionnaire and invited to participate in a face-to-face interview regarding their general experiences and thoughts related to telehealth and face-to-face consultations. Occasions of service costs and direct hospital expenses were provided by the central health service's telehealth office.

Results: The use of telehealth alone or as part of a mixed model was acceptable and convenient for most patients. In addition, high levels of satisfaction were reported including improved access to specialist services, reduced travel time and an ease of use of the telehealth system. The total cost saving was A$308 per occasion of service.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that the model was effective in providing outpatient services and cost effective to the health service, while being experienced as a satisfactory model by patients.

Keywords: cancer care; haematology; models of care; regional; rural; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Bradford NK, Caffery LJ, Smith AC. Telehealth services in rural and remote Australia: a systematic review of models of care and factors influencing success and sustainability. Rural Remote Health 2016; 16: 3808.
    1. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 2000; 321: 826.
    1. Schwamm HL, Chumbler CN, Brown CE, Fonarow CG, Berube CD, Nystrom CK et al. Recommendations for the implementation of telehealth in cardiovascular and stroke care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017; 135: e24-44.
    1. Landow SM, Mateus A, Korgavkar K, Nightingale D, Weinstock MA. Teledermatology: key factors associated with reducing face-to-face dermatology visits. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 71: 570-6.
    1. Wade R, Cartwright C, Shaw K. Carers' perceptions of the impact of home telehealth monitoring on the provision of care and sustainability of use. Australas J Ageing 2015; 34: 109-14.

LinkOut - more resources