Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Jan:102:532-537.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.098. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

COVID-19 hospital outbreaks: Protecting healthcare workers to protect frail patients. An Italian observational cohort study

Affiliations
Observational Study

COVID-19 hospital outbreaks: Protecting healthcare workers to protect frail patients. An Italian observational cohort study

Luigi Vimercati et al. Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among exposed healthcare workers (HCWs) after preventive protocol implementation.

Methods: A total of 5750 HCWs were included in the study. Those in contact with COVID-19 patients were allocated into a high-risk or a low-risk group based on contact type (PPE- or non-PPE-protected); high-risk workers underwent nasopharyngeal swab tests, while among low-risk workers, swab tests were carried out only for symptomatic workers (active surveillance). The prevalence was determined by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction on nasopharyngeal samples.

Results: 3570 HCWs had contact with 1065 COVID-19 patients. Among them, 3494 were subjected to active surveillance (low-risk group); 2886 (82.60%) were subjected to a swab test; and 15 were positive (0.52%). Seventy-six HCWs (2.13% of exposed) were included in the high-risk group, and a swab test was mandatory for each participant. Overall, 66 (86.84% of high-risk) were negative, and 10 were positive (13.16%), resulting in a higher risk of infection than in the low-risk group [OR = 29.00; 95% CI:12.56-66.94; p < 0.0001].

Conclusion: To date, the SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence is 0.70% among exposed HCWs and 0.435% among all HCWs working at the examined university hospital. The correct use of PPE and the early identification of symptomatic workers are essential factors to avoiding nosocomial clusters.

Keywords: COVID-19; Healthcare workers; Prevention protocol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preventive protocol flowchart. The flowchart extensively describes the preventive protocol initiated in the cohort of 5750 workers. Between March 11 and April 29, 3570 HCWs (62.09% of the total) had contact with 1065 COVID-19 patients. Based on preventive officers’ reports, 3494 HCWs, having PPE-protected close contacts (97.87%), were subjected to active surveillance (Low-risk Group). Among them, 2886 (82.60%) manifested at least one evocative symptom (described in Table 2) and were subjected to a swab test; 2871 (99.48% of low-risk symptomatic HCWs) were negative, and only 15 HCWs (0.53%) were positive, of whom 2 were positive after the second test. On the other hand, 76 HCWs were included in the high-risk group due to non-PPE-protected contacts, and a swab test was mandatory for each participant. Overall, 66 HCWs (86.84% of the high-risk group) were negative, and 10 were positive (13.16%), of whom 2 had a statistically higher risk of infection after the second test than the low-risk group [OR = 29.00; CI95%:12.56–66.94; p < 0.0001]. In yellow boxes, checkpoints are performed by prevention officers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab tests. Data from 3109 nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab tests performed in the cohort of 2962 HCWs. As shown in Figure 3, the weekly incidence of positive tests slowly decreased after protocol initiation, from 4.3% in week 2 (March 19–March 25) to 0.47% in week 7 (April 23–April 29).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Incidence of positive swab tests. Weekly incidence of positive swab tests in the worker cohort.

References

    1. Baldassarre A., Giorgi G., Alessio F., Lulli L.G., Arcangeli G., Mucci N. Stigma and discrimination (SAD) at the time of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):6341. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176341. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blake H., Bermingham F., Johnson G., Tabner A. Mitigating the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: a digital learning package. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):E2997. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17092997. Published online April 26, 2020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bulduk E.Ö. Work-related stress levels and musculoskeletal disorders among municipal solid waste collectors in Ankara. Work. 2019;63(3):427–433. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192949. PMID: 31256109. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . 2020. Hand Hygiene Guideline. Page reviewed online on January 30, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/providers/guideline.html [Accessed 27 May 2020]
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . 2020. Interim Guidelines for Collecting, Handling, and Testing Clinical Specimens from Persons for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Published online 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/guidelines-clinical-specim... [Accessed 27 May 2020]

Publication types

MeSH terms