Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 4;9(11):3554.
doi: 10.3390/jcm9113554.

Three Drug Combinations in the Treatment of Fit Elderly Multiple Myeloma Patients

Affiliations
Review

Three Drug Combinations in the Treatment of Fit Elderly Multiple Myeloma Patients

Hélène Gardeney et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

The multiple myeloma (MM) non transplant eligible (NTE) population is growing in line with the aging of the population in Western countries. Historically, this population has been known for having a greater risk of treatment related toxicity, and therefore drug development was slow and rather oriented towards the improvement of safety profile than the optimization of disease control. However, NTE MM patients, at least for the fit/non frail patients in recent years, seemed to have benefited more from a less palliative care to improve the depth of response and then prolong survival. NTE MM being a quite heterogeneous population, there are still a number of groups of patients that are in need of more efficient therapy, avoiding unnecessary toxicity, particularly for the frail patients. The use of triplet regimen with a melphalan-prednisone (MP) backbone has long been the standard of care for NTE MM, often dedicated to non-frail patients. New standards of care, triplet, and even quadruplet combinations, are emerging on the basis of the MP backbone but also on the more recently approved lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) backbone. These developments were largely possible in line with the development of antibody-based immunotherapies (IT) in MM. The objective to improve outcomes with an acceptable safety profile will see other key therapeutic developments such as the dropping of dexamethasone early in the disease course or various attempts to allow permanent treatment discontinuation with a prolonged disease control. In that context, it is possible that immunomonitoring, minimal residual disease (MRD), and genomic risk-adaptation will become key elements of the treatment decisions on triplet-based regimens.

Keywords: elderly; frailty; multiple myeloma; survival; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Palumbo A., Bringhen S., Ludwig H., Dimopoulos M.A., Bladé J., Mateos M.V., Rosiñol L., Boccadoro M., Cavo M., Lokhorst H., et al. Personalized therapy in multiple myeloma according to patient age and vulnerability: A report of the European Myeloma Network (EMN) Blood. 2011;118:4519–4529. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-358812. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brenner H., Gondos A., Pulte D. Recent major improvement in long-term survival of younger patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008;111:2521–2526. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-104984. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zweegman S., Engelhardt M., LaRocca A. Elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2017;29:315–321. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000395. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avet-Loiseau H., Hulin C., Campion L., Rodon P., Marit G., Attal M., Royer B., Dib M., Voillat L., Bouscary D., et al. Chromosomal Abnormalities Are Major Prognostic Factors in Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma: The Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome Experience. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:2806–2809. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.2598. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bringhen S., Mateos M.V., Zweegman S., Larocca A., Falcone A.P., Oriol A., Rossi D., Cavalli M., Wijermans P., Ria R., et al. Age and organ damage correlate with poor survival in myeloma patients: Meta-analysis of 1435 individual patient data from 4 randomized trials. Haematologica. 2013;98:980–987. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.075051. - DOI - PMC - PubMed