Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Nov 6;10(11):e042555.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042555.

Acute stress of the healthcare workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic evolution: a cross-sectional study in Spain

Affiliations
Observational Study

Acute stress of the healthcare workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic evolution: a cross-sectional study in Spain

José Joaquín Mira et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the volume of health professionals who suffered distress due to their care of patients with COVID-19 and to analyse the direction in which the response capacity of the professionals to face future waves of COVID-19 is evolving.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Setting: Primary care and hospitals in Spain.

Participants: A non-randomised sample of 685 professionals (physicians, nurses and other health staff).

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Frequency and intensity of stress responses measured by the Acute Stress of Health Professionals Caring COVID-19 Scale (EASE). Variation of stress responses according to the number of deaths per day per territory and the evolutionary stage of the COVID-19 outbreak measured by the Kruskal-Wallis and the Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results: The average score on the EASE Scale was 11.1 (SD 6.7) out of 30. Among the participants, 44.2% presented a good emotional adjustment, 27.4% a tolerable level of distress, 23.9% medium-high emotional load and 4.5% extreme acute stress. The stress responses were more intense in the most affected territories (12.1 vs 9.3, p=0.003) and during the disillusionment phase (12.7 vs 8.5 impact, 10.2 heroic and 9.8 honeymoon, p=0.000).

Conclusions: The pandemic has affected the mental health of a significant proportion of health professionals which may reduce their resilience in the face of future waves of COVID-19. The institutional approaches to support the psychological needs of health professionals are essential to ensure optimal care considering these results.

Keywords: anxiety disorders; depression & mood disorders; health policy; organisation of health services; public health; quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Johns Hopkins University & Medicine Coronavirus resource center. COVID-19 Dashboard by the center for systems science and engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). Available: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html [Accessed 08 Jul 2020].
    1. Corporación Radio y Televisión Española (rtve) Los profesionales sanitarios contagiados de COVID-19 superan Los 52.000, 81 en La última semana. Available: https://www.rtve.es/noticias/20200619/profesionales-sanitarios-contagiad... [Accessed 19 Jun 2020].
    1. Binkley CE, Kemp DS. Ethical rationing of personal protective equipment to minimize moral residue during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Surg 2020;230:1111–3. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.03.031 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steinberg E, Balakrishna A, Habboushe J, et al. . Calculated decisions: COVID-19 calculators during extreme resource-limited situations. Emerg Med Pract 2020;22:CD1–5. - PubMed
    1. Hall LH, Johnson J, Watt I, et al. . Healthcare staff wellbeing, burnout, and patient safety: a systematic review. PLoS One 2016;11:e0159015. 10.1371/journal.pone.0159015 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types