Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov;5(11):e002661.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002661.

Enhancing the use of stakeholder analysis for policy implementation research: towards a novel framing and operationalised measures

Affiliations
Review

Enhancing the use of stakeholder analysis for policy implementation research: towards a novel framing and operationalised measures

Marysol Astrea Balane et al. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Policy is shaped and influenced by a diverse set of stakeholders at the global, national and local levels. While stakeholder analysis is a recognised practical tool to assess the positions and engagement of actors relevant to policy, few empirical studies provide details of how complex concepts such as power, interest and position are operationalised and assessed in these types of analyses. This study aims to address this gap by reviewing conceptual approaches underlying stakeholder analyses and by developing a framework that can be applied to policy implementation in low-and-middle income countries.

Methods: The framework was developed through a three-step process: a scoping review, peer review by health policy experts and the conduct of an analysis using key informant interviews and a consensus building exercise. Four characteristics were selected for inclusion: levels of knowledge, interest, power and position of stakeholders related to the policy.

Result: The framework development process highlighted the need to revisit how we assess the power of actors, a key issue in stakeholder analyses, and differentiate an actor's potential power, based on resources, and whether they exercise it, based on the actions they take for or against a policy. Exploration of the intersections between characteristics of actors and their level of knowledge can determine interest, which in turn can affect stakeholder position on a policy, showing the importance of analysing these characteristics together. Both top-down and bottom-up approaches in implementation must also be incorporated in the analysis of policy actors, as there are differences in the type of knowledge, interest and sources of power among national, local and frontline stakeholders.

Conclusion: The developed framework contributes to health policy research by offering a practical tool for analysing the characteristics of policy actors and tackling the intricacies of assessing complex concepts embedded in the conduct of stakeholder analyses.

Keywords: health policy; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors report grants from Wellcome Trust, during the conduct of the study; LPV reports grants from Philippine College of Physicians, non-financial support from Sanofi and Cadila and grants from WHO Asia Pacific Observatory, outside the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Methodology for framework development.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram of scoping review on stakeholder characteristics.

References

    1. Schmeer K. Stakeholder analysis guidelines, 2000. Available: https://www.who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/toolkit/33.pdf [Accessed 3 Mar 2019].
    1. Varvasovszky Z, Brugha R. How to do (or not do). A stakeholder analysis. 15 Oxford Univ Press, 2000: 338–45. http://dess.fmp.ueh.edu.ht/pdf/Zsuzsa_Varvasovsky_2000_stakeholder_analy... - PubMed
    1. Howlett M, Ramesh M. Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. second ed Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2003.
    1. Surjadjaja C, Mayhew SH. Can policy analysis theories predict and inform policy change? reflections on the battle for legal abortion in Indonesia. Health Policy Plan 2011;26:373–84. 10.1093/heapol/czq079 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lehmann U, Gilson L. Actor interfaces and practices of power in a community health worker programme: a South African study of unintended policy outcomes. Health Policy Plan 2013;28:358–66. 10.1093/heapol/czs066 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources