Guideline recommendations and the positioning of newer drugs in type 2 diabetes care
- PMID: 33159841
- PMCID: PMC12140926
- DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30343-0
Guideline recommendations and the positioning of newer drugs in type 2 diabetes care
Erratum in
-
Correction to Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2021; 9: 46-52.Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Jan;9(1):e1. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30407-1. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021. PMID: 33338417 No abstract available.
Abstract
Cardiovascular outcome trials in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk have led to remarkable advances in our understanding of the effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors to reduce cardiorenal events. In 2019, the American Diabetes Association (ADA), European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published updated recommendations for the management of such patients. We are concerned that ongoing discussions focusing on the differences between the endocrinologists' consensus report from the ADA and EASD and cardiologists' guidelines from the ESC are contributing to clinical inertia, thereby effectively denying evidence-based treatments advocated by both groups to patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiorenal disease. A subset of members from the writing groups of the ADA-EASD consensus report and the ESC guidelines was convened to emphasise where commonalities exist and to propose an integrated framework that encompasses the views incorporated in management approaches proposed by the ESC and the ADA and EASD. Coordinated action is required to ensure that people with type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease are treated appropriately with an SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist. In our opinion, this course should be initiated independent of background therapy, current glycaemic control, or individualised treatment goals.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04007926.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
NM, PJG, and FC were members of the writing group for the 2019 European Society of Cardiology guidelines. MJD, CM, and JBB were members of the writing group for the updated 2019 consensus report from the American Diabetes Association and European Association for the Study of Diabetes. NM has given lectures for Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Novo Nordisk; has received unrestricted research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; and has served as an advisor for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Novo Nordisk. NM has also served in trial leadership for Boehringer Ingelheim and Novo Nordisk. NM declines all personal compensation from pharmaceutical and device companies. MJD has served as a consultant, advisory board member, and speaker for Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Janssen; an advisory board member for Servier and Gilead Sciences; and a speaker for the Napp Pharmaceuticals, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals International. MJD has also received grants in support of investigator-initiated trials from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Janssen. PJG is diabetes advisor to Synexus and editor-in-chief of
Comment in
-
Positioning newer drugs in the management of type 2 diabetes.Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Mar;9(3):138-139. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00022-X. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021. PMID: 33607038 No abstract available.
-
Positioning newer drugs in the management of type 2 diabetes.Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Mar;9(3):139-140. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00021-8. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021. PMID: 33607039 No abstract available.
References
-
- Mulnier HE, Seaman HE, Raleigh VS, et al. Risk of myocardial infarction in men and women with type 2 diabetes in the UK: a cohort study using the General Practice Research Database. Diabetologia 2008; 51: 1639–45. - PubMed
-
- UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–53. - PubMed
-
- ADVANCE Collaborative Group. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2560–72. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
