Pure Single-site Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using Single-port Versus Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single-institution Comparative Study
- PMID: 33160915
- DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.006
Pure Single-site Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using Single-port Versus Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single-institution Comparative Study
Abstract
Background: Pure single-site robot-assisted extraperitoneal prostatectomy (EPP) using a single-port (SP) robotic platform has been shown to be feasible and safe in previous descriptive studies.
Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing SP-EPP versus conventional multiport (MP) transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Design, setting, and participants: From January 2019 to January 2020, data of 100 consecutive patients who underwent SP-EPP performed by the same surgeon and 110 consecutive patients who underwent MP-RARP by three surgeons from the same institution were prospectively collected.
Intervention: All SP-EPPs were performed in a pure single-site fashion without Trendelenburg.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Demographic characteristics as well as intra- and postoperative data of patients in both groups were analyzed. Quantitative data were described in terms of median and quartiles.
Results and limitations: After SP-EPP, the rate of patients discharged the same day was nine times higher than that after MP-RARP (p < 0.001), and the median length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter: 4.3 h (interquartile range [IQR] 3.3-17.4) versus 26.1 h (IQR 21.5-44.8). The rate of opioid use in the hospital and after discharge in the SP group was at least half that in the MP group (respectively, 32% vs 64%, p < 0.001, and 35% vs 87%, p < 0.001). The overall positive surgical margin rate as well as continence rate at 12 mo (85% vs 88%, p = 0.97) and the prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival (p = 0.09) were statistically comparable between the SP and MP groups.
Conclusions: Pure single-site SP-EPP was associated with a shorter length of stay as well as a decreased need for postoperative pain medication and narcotic administration in comparison with conventional transperitoneal multiport prostatectomy, with comparable postoperative complications and readmission rate.
Patient summary: Surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer using a single-port robotic platform allows for a shorter hospital stay, less pain, and less opioid use than conventional robotic surgery without more morbidity. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Pure single-site single-port extraperitoneal prostatectomy was associated with a shorter length of stay as well as a decreased need for postoperative pain medication and narcotic administration in comparison with conventional transperitoneal multiport prostatectomy, with comparable postoperative complication and readmission rate.
Keywords: Comparative effectiveness; Prostate neoplasm; Prostatectomy; Robotic; Robotic surgery; Single-port surgery.
Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes of Single-Port vs Multiport Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Meta-Analysis.J Endourol. 2022 Jan;36(1):83-98. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0210. Epub 2021 Jul 21. J Endourol. 2022. PMID: 34157849
-
Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using Single-port Perineal Approach: Technique and Single-surgeon Matched-paired Comparative Outcomes.Eur Urol. 2021 Mar;79(3):384-392. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.013. Epub 2020 Dec 21. Eur Urol. 2021. PMID: 33357990
-
Perioperative Complications of Single-Port and Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institutional Comparison Analysis.J Endourol. 2024 May;38(5):450-457. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0652. Epub 2024 Apr 1. J Endourol. 2024. PMID: 38420656
-
Single-institution Cost Comparison: Single-port Versus Multiport Robotic Prostatectomy.Eur Urol Focus. 2021 May;7(3):532-536. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jul 4. Eur Urol Focus. 2021. PMID: 32631777
-
Single-port versus multiport robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the da Vinci SP platform.Prostate. 2022 Mar;82(4):405-414. doi: 10.1002/pros.24296. Epub 2022 Jan 5. Prostate. 2022. PMID: 34985775
Cited by
-
Learning curve analysis of extraperitoneal single-site robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a CUSUM-based approach.J Robot Surg. 2025 Jan 10;19(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02202-3. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 39792294 Free PMC article.
-
Perioperative efficiency and clinical outcomes of single-port versus multi-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an updated meta-analysis.J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 18;19(1):492. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02679-6. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40824469 Review.
-
First 100 cases of transvesical single-port robotic radical prostatectomy.Asian J Urol. 2023 Oct;10(4):416-422. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.12.005. Epub 2023 Feb 11. Asian J Urol. 2023. PMID: 38024442 Free PMC article.
-
Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Comparison Among Extraperitoneal Single-port and Transperitoneal Multiport Radical Prostatectomy-A Single-center Experience.Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Aug 12;67:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.07.110. eCollection 2024 Sep. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024. PMID: 39229365 Free PMC article.
-
Extraperitoneal single-site robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection: technique and experience.BJU Int. 2025 Apr;135(4):700-705. doi: 10.1111/bju.16670. Epub 2025 Jan 30. BJU Int. 2025. PMID: 39887625 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources